Jump to content

User talk:Ridernyc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sbkbg (talk | contribs) at 05:08, 21 February 2008 (→‎WFAL). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ridernyc's talk archive page 1 page 2

No

My edit to Matoran was NOT vandalism. -Karaku (talk) 02:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you might want to know policy before messing with tags. Ridernyc (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalism. It's the opposite. BZPower is reliable. -Karaku (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{Oldprodfull}}

Hello, Ridernyc ... please see Talk:Marie Slaughter and tell me what you think of my newly created Template:Oldprodfull ... would you use it, or update it if you encountered it?

Also, what are your thoughts on my proposed WP:FLAG-BIO protocol?

Happy Editing! — 72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 13:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sequence (journal)

I saw you tagged the article Sequence (journal) with four issues

  • Unreferenced
  • Notability
  • Short lead
  • Cleanup

The article is marked as stub. In any stub article, Cleanup and Short lead tags are not needed because stubs may not have any lead at all. And cleanup tags are not applied in stubs. I just wanted to tell these facts regarding new page patrol. Cheers. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The notability of Sequence is not in question. I'll add to the article as I make progress on the main project, Lindsay Anderson. --Tony Sidaway 17:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
when there are no references and no claims to notability yes notability is in question.17:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Do you know anything about British cinema of the second half of the twentieth century? --Tony Sidaway 17:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dai Shi

I'm working on this article, it's not a test article like the other ones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grounded into a double play (talk • contribs) 04:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now why would someone block me for making test articles? Such pages are usually deleted, but why would someone want to block me for create an article about a TV character? Grounded into a double play (talk)

WFAL

I don't appreciate your request to delete when you clearly haven't checked the history of the page, i added info about college sports and also a link for references I've talked to covus cornix about proper citations, etc.--Sbkbg (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

if you check the discussion page of the article, i noted that I fixed the issues, by providing outside sources... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbkbg (talk • contribs) 03:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ok, wiki says tags can be removed when the issue is solved, I also noted that they were fixed on the articles talk page. and i already presented a valid argument for keeping, all i did was some minor edits to a page created like 3 years ago... you said there was no sources so i cited sources, wiki does not specify what kinda news paper.. I'm taking this higher then some wiki bully like you!--Sbkbg (talk) 03:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't added anything you wouldn't find in other articles, I have added any personal promotion, etc. just a few minor edits and updated info. check the previous versions and see what i changed, NOTHING. obviously you're the only one that has a problem in however long the article has been around for. COI is not the same a primary souces i.e an expert on the topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbkbg (talk • contribs) 04:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just reviewed COI and I am right, just because I know the org. doesn't make it self promo or advertising... if i put something like WFAL is the best radio station ever! then i could see why someone would be upset. But I added a few new details and updates. --Sbkbg (talk) 04:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the COI tag, I'm not the creator, I put less than a paragraph of info into it.--Sbkbg (talk) 04:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have an amazing ability at selective reading "The creator of this article, or someone who has substantially contributed to it, may have a conflict of interest regarding its subject matter." The article is 4 paragraphs long, you say you contributed 1 paragraph, that would be 25% of the article including all it's sources pretty substantial contribution to it. Ridernyc (talk) 04:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to count the words, it's prob less than a paragraph, mostly sources, and such. The station has numerous shows during the day and also carries BGSU and local high school sporting events. and The station is primarily used for students wishing to persue jobs in the radio and communications industry to gain first hand knowlege and experience on operations of a radio station and shows. Def not COI! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbkbg (talk • contribs) 04:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
wow, you just don't go away, I am however I have better things to do than argue with you, THE ONLY PERSON VANDILIZING WIKIPEDIA IS YOU!!--Sbkbg (talk) 05:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ridernyc&oldid=192974456"