Jump to content

User talk:WarthogDemon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kpkammer (talk | contribs) at 18:24, 29 February 2008 (Interact club page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome back!

Long time, no see. =) Welcome back. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [1] - WarthogDemon 00:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so

As much as I would love for that garbage to be speedied, I don't think it qualifies. Slap a prod on it though, definitely. If it's removed, bring up an AfD. I'll definitely support it. Just curious, why did you ask me? Not that I mind. Just wondering. Hazillow (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [2] -WarthogDemon 01:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hahah yeah, Cluebot isn't very talkative. Happy editing. Hazillow (talk) 01:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another Welcome

Welcome back, and...err, umm. -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 01:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry :P

you beat me to warning him, and i cant find that template -_- what is the code for it? (the first warning thing) --Fejj the ritualchatcontributions —Preceding comment was added at 01:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [3]. -WarthogDemon 01:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:DmanXdecy

It looked like a fantasy page (none of the bluelinks were actual wrestlers), so I replaced the page with a warning and citation to WP:NOT. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 20:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sport Issues

Re your message: The AfD seems reasonable to me. Since you did an AfD for one, I would recommend doing another AfD for the other. The bio and claim to notability is pretty much the same, so doing one AfD and one PROD wouldn't be right. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [4]. -WarthogDemon 22:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: Since all three articles and their claim to notability is the same: All declared their intention to go to UNC and all played in the 2008 McDonald's High School All-American game with the same references, you can probably bundle them into a single AfD instead of making three separate ones. I would merge with the one for Tyler Zeller and notify any editors who have contributed to the AfD discussion that you modified the AfD. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: No need to delete anything. Do redirects of the two you merged over. Actually, I recommend the redirects so that it's easier to find sometime in the future (if necessary). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Replied here: [5]. -WarthogDemon 22:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: It's okay. You've been away for awhile, so being out of practice is understandable. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting my articles

The players are McDonald's All-Americans and will be significant contributors to the UNC basketball team next season. Do some research before you start nominating articles for deletion. The McDonald's All-Americans are the top ~25 players in the USA out of thousands. BTW if you are deleting my articles why not nominate this one --> Elliot Williams?DP08 (talk) 22:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Jennings, he's in the same boat.DP08 (talk) 22:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Replied here: [6]. -WarthogDemon 22:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, well I just don't understand the point when everyone knows they will be starring on national television night in and night out on ESPN, etc. It'll be back up in 6-8 months, lol. DP08 (talk) 22:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You Are An Idiot (Talking To Myself)

BAH! You call Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Zeller a merge? You are a disgrace! I laugh at you! -WarthogDemon 22:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil. -WarthogDemon 22:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good prodding and vandalism reverting

Good prodding and vandalism watching buddy. I hearby give you:

WikiMedal for Janitorial Services
For sifting through the garbage, making Wikipedia a cleaner place. Hazillow (talk) 08:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alisha

I'm assuming good faith with the IP, but you may be right about it being somebody impersonating the artist. At any rate, monitoring their contributions is probably a good idea. That said, I feel that "I don't want my name listed" is not a good reason to remove the name from the article. However, since the birth name isn't sourced, WP:BLP gives good reason to remove the name from the article. That's what I've done, under the reason of it being unsourced information, and I've edit-summaried accordingly. —C.Fred (talk) 01:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PIRA Energy Group

It seems semi-notable, however, the article is clearly biased and needs a rewrite. I would advise prod'ing or whacking it down to a stub. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cro0016

Hello, WarthogDemon. You have new messages at Cro0016's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Interact club page

Why do you want my page deleted? It is talking about a Rotary International club. You asked "Does it meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)?" and I'm new to Wikepedia and am not 100% sure what that even means but it says "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." and Rotary International is published in many reliable, independent secondary sources. They have over 1.2 million members world wide, and are the reason why now almost all of the world is polio free.