User talk:Sceptre/Archive 41

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

edit

Some handy links

I'm still around, pottering away, editing where I need to.

The current local time is: 07:08, 19 November 2024 (GMT)

Only 51677 articles (0.748%) are featured or good. Make a difference: improve an article!

edit

Sceptre's talk page: Archive 41

edit

Chelseaadmin

Hi there - just a quickie. I think your report of User:Chelseaadmin was a little hasty (leaving aside the fact that they are now blocked for a username violation). The edit you linked to wasn't vandalism, and they had had no warnings in relation to vandalism (and only two edits overall). Thanks! _GB^T/C 20:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Do I get to hit you with the flamingo? _GB^T/C 20:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I may do yet, actually - what's with User:163.150.21.253? Looks like good faith additions, to me? _GB^T/C 20:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know - by you here. Which of their edits are supposed to be vandalism? I'm a Mac user, so not clear on how Huggle works - how automated is it? _GB^T/C 20:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry to harp on, but I've now removed User: Jbi56. You're reporting them to WP:AIV, but I cannot see that any of the edits cited are vandalism. What's going on? _GB^T/C 20:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really questioning your reverts, just the part about reports to AIV. I think you might want to consider not using Huggle - User:Jbi56, for example, actually has no warnings on their user talk page, as far as I can see. User:Chelseaadmin had, and has, none. Something's not quite right, I think...? Either it's reporting when it shouldn't, or you're reporting when you shouldn't. I have no idea which, but it could start to get a bit disruptive if we have to question the veracity of someone's reports to WP:AIV. Thanks! _GB^T/C 20:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you're right on Jbi - the warnings were tucked away deep inside all the standard image warning templates. Thanks for your time! _GB^T/C 20:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this is Timcanterbury616--I think you're mistaken that I was "vandalizing" the "The Megas" page. I changed the See also to More Information because now there are two See Also's. I am going to change it back, but please leave it be next time, and also I don't think the change I made qualifies as "vandalism". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timcanterbury616 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, better safe than sorry!!!!

Some confusion?

You've reverted 2 of my edits. One which was simply the addition of cite tags [1], while the other was removal or a previous vandalism and the addition of the word "internationally" [2]. Both are constructive edits, neither of which are vandalism. Your warnings about blocking me from editing are unfounded. As such, I am reverting your changes until proper reasoning is discuss. Thanks!AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 20:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saw you note on my talk page. Thanks for catching that. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 20:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Current talk
Bot			IP				RfA

1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
31	32	33	34	35	36	37	38	39	40
41	42	43	44	45	46	47	48	49	50
51	52	53	54	55	56	57	58	59	60
61	62	63	64	65