Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sega Mega Drive/1

Sega Mega Drive

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page

Result pending

The article has many cleanup and fact tags. And needs many references to be cited. David Pro (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't see any cleanup or fact tags at all. All [citation needed] tags have been cited during the last week or so. I think it deserves to be a Good Article. Zebbe (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment. The reviewed version of the article had cleanup and fact tags tags. The reviewer correctly quick-failed the article. Since then the article's editors have done a great job addressing concerns. In these situations the best course of action is to re-nominate the article at GAN. Majoreditor (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Concur with Majoreditor (also see my comment on Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Joker (comics)/1 below). EyeSerene^TALK 12:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)