User talk:Twaz

welcome, cuz

welcome to my talk page. i'm currently trying to implement an archiving system using ClueBot. Suggestions would be helpful."Twaz" --InvisibleDiplomat₆⁶₆ 00:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:DEA

Thanks for the message. Don't worry, I didn't think it was personal or bad or anything. Are you planning to run the RfA gauntlet sometime soon? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 03:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I'd be happy to help you out or give you specific advice any time you need it. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Good Night

- Good night, and I am sorry for what I said above. I was a little frustrated, and I felt like the hidden note in the article was immature. Cheers, Glacier Wolf 02:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Yes, there are a number of User Warnings. To simplify this, some JS Tools are used. One of them is known as WP:TWINKLE. The one I use is called Huggle. Choose which one works best for you. :) Also, you can report users to Administrators Intervention against Vandalism if they are disruptive, and you warn them past the final warning (Level 4). For more information, please see WP:CVU or WP:CUV. Cheers, Glacier Wolf 03:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

If you need Huggle, I can email the program to you. Just send me a message to glacierwolf3@gmail.com. Cheers, Glacier Wolf 03:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

 Done. When you save the program, you have to rename the file to huggle.zip, so that it will work correctly. OK? Cheers, Glacier Wolf 03:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Personal Attack

Because you don't retain material in either this page or an archive, it took a bit to review what happened. This edit by GlacierWolf was indeed highly in violation of WP:NPA and WP:CIV, but it's good to see he has apologized. I should add that such hidden text is generally not used, though as far as I'm aware there is no rule against it. I'll keep my eye of the Pythagoras page and monitor for issues of vandalism and if necessary protection. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 03:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

...

what is th 6 6 6 for —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.97.25.98 (talk) 00:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks, man. Lexicon (talk) 04:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

that was fast Dlohcierekim 05:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Anon

No problem. They were working their way through multiple articles, vandalizing as they went, but looks like things are pretty well cleaned-up at this point. If you want, I could also semi-protect your userpage to prevent this kind of thing from happening again? That'll still let you and other good-faith contributors make any necessary tweaks, but will keep off the anons. --Elonka 16:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Done.  :) --Elonka 17:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I hear Jimbo raises some tasty roosters:

Thanks: [1] ... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Block

If they only come here to vandalise, then I think it needs to be "thank you and goodbye!" There was a bit too much knowledge of finding their way around for it to be a neophyte and purely genuine errors. If they think it too tough, they can request an unblocking. cheers. Kbthompson (talk) 18:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page and reporting the vandal. swaq 18:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

1, so you were there, big deal, are you the ref or an official with any sort of authority? i dont think so 2, the ref called it a save, i dont contest that the us won the cup or that the ref's ruling (or non-call) has legal power, but morally the us didnt win it fair and square 3, dont slap a vandalism sticker on me jus coz you dont like what i said. i just want to argue for my case