Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The God Who Wasn't There

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BrianFlemming (talk | contribs) at 03:04, 31 July 2005 ([[The God Who Wasn't There]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Article about a straight-to-video documentary, written as if it were copied directly from a press release. NN, WP is not advertising, etc. Calton | Talk 06:00, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep Real documentary obviously in reach of the public (has a IMDb page). Good enough for me. Notable. CanadianCaesar 06:43, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep although it needs EXTENSIVE cleanup. ~~~~ 08:05, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep IMDB-proven, actual film. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:17, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Ken 13:35, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Verifiable, notable. 23skidoo 14:08, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Carlton is also trying to delete the Atheists of Silicon Valley Wikipedia entry, so PLEASE go there and vote to keep it! Thanks. 30 July 2005
  • I was going to vote keep but NPOV the blurb - but unfortunately, much of it is a copyvio (keep if I'm wrong)--Doc (?) 19:00, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Important historical and educational documentary. The user who voted to delete this entry clearly has an agenda, since he has attacked other atheist entries. 30 July 2005
  • Keep I've seen it - this film is groundbreaking and the article is accurate. 30 July 2005
  • Keep What? Why in the world should this be deleted? It's an amazing documentary that should be required viewing. Yes, I suspect there is a Right-Wing agenda and trying to keep a legitimate film from the public. 30 July 2005
  • Keep The recent "copyright problem" notice attached to this entry is rather clearly frivolous. The text in question is not original to Microcinema but is instead a plot summary provided freely to anyone by the makers of the film. I know this because I wrote that summary and made the film. I would suggest Wikipedia users opposed to this movie should submit information about the controversy rather than trying to delete its entry. BrianFlemming 30 July 2005