Jump to content

User talk:Xgmx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Xgmx (talk | contribs) at 23:26, 3 April 2008 (→‎sry). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Block?

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Xgmx (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
4.245.73.33 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

hardening block


Decline reason: You are directly blocked for AfD vandalism. — IrishGuy talk 00:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my god why can't I edit articles, it says block! please help me.--Xgmx (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

block 2

Here I recreated this with my username instead of my IP address, its probably easier for you tech support people out there.--Xgmx (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to post false messages of unblocking yourself and add more unblock requests, I will protect this page. It isn't a playground. IrishGuy talk 01:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Well the others disappeared and I would like to get this problem fixed asap (as soon as possible)--Xgmx (talk) 01:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't going to be fixed. You were blocked for disruptive actions. Your actions on this talk page give me no reason to believe you will act different in the future. IrishGuy talk 01:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I'm afraid I'm going to have to come to xgmx's defense in this case.--4.244.33.244 talk 4.244.33.244|Contributions 23:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks 4.244.33.244--Xgmx (talk) 16:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xgmx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry, I believe I was wrongly banned by Daniel Case though.

Decline reason:

Reviewing your contributions, the block was appropriate. Your actions at AfD were disruptive and you were told several times to stop. Please do not abuse this template, doing so will result in this talk page being protected. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock 2 (since the other was declined)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xgmx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

No reason given to lift block. — Yamla (talk) 17:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

sry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xgmx (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I seriously won't mess around with Wikipedia any more, I promise, that Mayasia thing was just a joke.

Decline reason:

Sorry, you've been unblocked once already when we tried to give you a second chance, and you abused that chance. You're also trying to circumvent this block using your IP address, which is not allowed. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there, what's you reason for unblocking? --The Helpful One (Review) 18:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


omfg, you got blocked x? lol here I'll help: UNBAN HIM OR ELSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--Ssfreefan (talk) 02:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


lol I think you got me unblocked, because I can edit here now, thanks, I sure won't make the same mistake again. Besides Daniel Case is a rogue admin, so his bans don't count.



Or what? lol--[[User:Xgmx|xgmx (T | C | D | R)