User talk:Disneyfreak96

	Archive Archives
	1 ·

Disney World

Yes, I have a great interest in Disney World, have been there many times - last in 1991. Though, I am somewhat up to date on newer parts of the park through the former Disney Magazine, Disney Website, and the History Channel program Modern Marvels - 2-hour program on Disney World all the way to the newest rides being built or just finished. I try to update some of the info on the parks and make changes to match the better ranked Disney pages. Animation is another interest. Seeking to create matching style Disney pages when possible, The Magic Kingdom's share many rides at both locationsKidsheaven 23:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA :)

Thank you, DizFreak (that is an awesome username!), for commenting on my RfA, which closed successfully with a tally of 76/0/1! I hope I will meet your expectations, and be sure I will continue trying to be a good editor as well as a good administrator :) If I may be of any assistance to you in the future (or if you see me commit some grievous error :), please drop me a line on my Talk page.

Again, thank you, and happy editing! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Hey im more than welcome to work with you and come to comproises on things . Sorry I am THE Michael Jackson expert here on wiki EVERYONE who knows me here on wiki agrees to that much. Often things are removed or changed on wiki and these tend to be on the same issues that are debated over and over again. Im not actually fussed on the whole MJ thing but i was unholding an informal consensus already reached on multiple occasions. Feel free to ask me anything or if you have any quiries, the link of the article is indeed long but its actually not our fault believe it or not. We have had chunks of things from the article merged to other pages already so that has helped but a month ago a consensus was reached to merge info about jacksons finances to the jackson article. Aside from that when considering lengh remember that jackson has had a 40 year career, as a group AND solo artist, is one of the most famous people alive and has a very complex personal life, there IS a lot to write about. Additionally, i have concerns about removing info about his career, at the moment the aticle has a 60/40 split in favour of his career over his personal issues, his career should actually have a larger preportion, removing career info will only turn it into a gossip column. Realist2 (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One thing ive really wanted to do is get ride of that "Themes and Genre" section and instead put audio samples throughout the article. This would be good because;

That section is the only truely poorly sourced /pov section and would improve the credibility of article.
It would remove 1000`s of bytes from article.
It would give people their own chance to judge his changing styles and they can make their own opinions unstead of reading ours. Realist2 (talk) 00:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to get rid of the Themes and Genre section. I am not that gifted in putting audio samples up so I will leave that to someone else.

I have worked on other articles on subjects that have been around for over 50 years. Often the best way is to minimize the subjects that have separate articles. For example, the Disneyland article had sections for each land, and through moving data to the articles on each land we have kept the full article down 51 kbs.I'd like to see this done to the Michael Jackson article if possible.

I would like to remove the small POV pieces that remain. --DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 02:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed definately on the pov parts, the vast majority of the pov tags are in that "Themes and Genres" section. Do you know anyone who could help with audios? When it comes to mergers we are going to have a major problem shipping info over to other articles. We cant ship anything over to the Thriller album page because in three weeks Thriller 25 is being merged to the Thriller album which will means that the thriller album article will be 50,000 bytes long alone. We cant merge anything to the bad album article as it has already had three mergers to it and is some 40,000 bytes long. Realist2 (talk) 13:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the Bad Album article has a very large section on the Bad tour. Perhaps that could be deleted or merged? Back to the actual Michael Jackson article, I see a lot of the information is in the Bad album article. However, before doing any large work I will be posting on the talk page so we can go over the edits and between us come up with a great article!--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 16:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That tour info was merged over to the bad article i believe and i dont think it would have been agreed to had they have known it would have been deleted. Like I said firstly we should do something about the "Themes section" and then we need to sort out the sources. We have about 13o sources and their all written out in full. The souces need to be abreviated and that will have bytes. I dont want to swop or remove tones of info if we end up not needing to. We should sort out those 2 things first and then cosider the rest of the content. Realist2 (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, since I can't do anything with the audio aka Themes, do you have any idea of what else I can do?--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 21:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of autonomous areas by country is now a Featured List - thanks for your support!

Thanks to your support, List of autonomous areas by country is now a Featured List! This is my first FL, and I hope to have many more in the future. Thanks for supporting the nomination! Gary King (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey ive nearly completed your list, i would appreciate if you add more advise and change your stance when its up to your standards. Thriller WILL be FA no matter what it takes. Oh and you never got back to me with helping me on MJ, i took some of your advise, though, i stuck it through a peer review, im gonna try to get it to FA in the summer and would appreciate your help and advise on that. Realist2 (talk) 20:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic Church

Thanks for your comments on the page - I will look to redo the ref that will end soon and have already addressed the comment regarding priest shortage by adding a sentence in the Demographics section. Thanks again. NancyHeise (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi. Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Best wishes. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thriller

The article's PR is already closed. And what are those infobox for? --Efe (talk) 06:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. I thought you were putting some announcements there. yah, I closed it. It was kinda bad and would produce nothing. I will try to clean-up the article and get another PR, someday. If you have time, please help. --Efe (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I watch listed your talk page. Realist is not here anymore so I would like everyone to forget what was done. Yeah, Thriller is one of the most important albums in music history. I will try to edit it soon but if you have time now, please do. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 06:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to start on it tomorrow. Its midnight here and time for me to get ready to fall asleep. I would love to work on the page.--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 06:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you. Have a "Beautiful Nightmare". =) --Efe (talk) 06:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up. I'm starting on the rewrite. Do you think we should just remove the info on Thriller 25 or give it its own page? I don't think it deserves its own page myself. --DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 16:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IM BACK!!!!!!!!! Realist2 (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed, I just saw my edits reversed without reason. Could you leave it on the talk page like I did? Thanks!--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 16:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I adjusted it in my second edit so that it was more suitable. Realist2 (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I want to get it to FA but we need to talk about these things, is there a place us three can discuss all this and work together? Realist2 (talk) 16:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is what the article Talk page is for.--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 16:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hum i dont want to clog that thing up, we can use my sandbox as a forum if you like, Realist2 (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archive what Thriller (album) has then start anew? Many controversial articles have large talk pages where every little word is discussed. Its not a problem for me, I'm used to it ;)--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 17:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a plan, this is a new era for Thriller, lets archive and start a fresh, care to take the honers. Realist2 (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me... on it now

I have responded at the talk page. Realist2 (talk) 19:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey i think we can really get this T25 thing sorted Yeah!!!!!!! I added US and WORLD sales figures to your version, they seem like the most important aspect to be, hope you dont mind? Realist2 (talk) 21:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me!DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 21:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are about 6 votes supporting it, i say we go for it. Realist2 (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ive added a message at Efe's talk page, hopefully he will support our compromise and we can get this sorted without hurting anyone too much. I never thought we would get an agreement that is satisfactory but this is about as close as you can get. Im really glad we moved on from the issue, even THE ELFOID , who was one of the people who wanted the original merger the most has agreed that it should have its own page again in hindsight. Im a little gutted that their wont be mch on T25 at the mother page but im prepared to let it go with this amicable middle ground. Realist2 (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear about contacting Efe. I've been so busy between working on this and writing two papers for class I didn't get the chance.

I appreciate your willingness to find a happy medium on this page. I know from past experience this is a subject close to your heart but I think the only way to get this to FA is to write to the masses so to speak.--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 03:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied at the talk page, clarifying your confusion hopefully. Feel free to make those changes accordingly. Realist2 (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for the upcheck. Realist2 (talk) 19:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx, aint heard off you in days! What you been up to? I started a Thriller peer review just now. Lets carry on working. Realist2 (talk) 03:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, work called. I'm looking forward to hearing from the folks during our peer review. Congrats on the Barnstar BTW.--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 03:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrfisch‎, Jayron32‎, SandyGeorgia‎ and Efe. Yeah ive had a barnstar since you been away and Thriller 25 is GA. Its been good times.Realist2 (talk) 03:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo dizfreak get back here. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 22:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, i would really appreciate if you kept all your focus on Thriller, the MJ article is under raps it just had 2 additional copy edits, Thriller is by far my biggest concern.Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 16:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got it! I agree Thriller is the most important right now. DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 16:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ive got different people helping me with either article, i dont think its health for people to be helping me with both, its best people stick to a single mission. MJ is going great, Thriller is where i need you. On and sorry for calling you a "he", when im translating what i want to say into english, i keep forgeting about masculine and femine. Doh!!!Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 17:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No big issue about the 'he'. I just wanted you to know! I make some mistakes myself since I began studying Latin myself. I did not know English was not your first language. You have a good understanding of it.

As for working on both articles, no worries. I understand where you are coming from.DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 17:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You start to notice after a while, i make tell tail mistakes, usually have to correct myself like 3 times for spelling. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 17:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archive Archives
1 ·