I am sure that you know how stalking on wikipedia is not allowed. All in all between 5 and 10 users are looking all my edits and I am OK with that, but I am not OK with your stalking because of your editorial history on wikipedia. This has been my first and last warning about your stalking !!!
In my personal thinking you have created trap in article SAO Western Slavonia so that your "favorite" administrator can block me but it has failed. Somebody of other users which are stalking me will revert your trap :)--Rjecina (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let me see... If have recieved on 16 March revert ban and only 2 days latter you have given me first warning [1] ?? Yes after seeing mistake you have reverted your warning few hours latter but this has not changed fact about warning.
On other side your revert in article SAO Western Slavonia is telling many things about your editorial style !! It will be very interesting day when you write demand for becoming administrator :)
Why did you remove my contribution to Croatia article?
Everybody knows that the first democratic elections were held back then and that the result was the Croatian independance.
I don't understand why????--(GriffinSB) (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. I'm honestly not as familiar with deletion of redirects as other areas so was not quite sure what the usual procedure was. I decided to take it to a deletion discussion to err on the side of caution. Everyone else seems to agree with you so far, though, so I'll tag it. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I was actually referring to vandalism. If you check the history of the page, Rjecina (talk·contribs) has consistently been deleting anything that was negative towards Croatia Records. He removed 2 sections beforehand which are common knowledge to people living in Croatia (or rest of former Yugoslavia for that matter). Furthermore, (s)he classified my edits as vandalism, when in fact his edits of the page were just that (deleting a large chunk of information after a certain part of the page). So I would definitely say RVV is the proper edit information for my edit. --64.46.2.216 (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I just wanted to say thats for reverting the vandalism on my page! Sorry i dint say thanks sooner but you only really notice what has happened when you look in the history. Thanks again. ·Add§hore·Talk/Cont12:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User:Cljose01
You didn't make a mistake -- it was an article when you nominated it. I just moved it to his userpage and removed the tag. :) NawlinWiki (talk) 16:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
With that kind of content, the article should be deleted and recreated as a real article about a real town. We don't need that in the history, and nothing there is salvageable. —BradV17:47, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I award you The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your amazing work to reverting vandalism. I have seen you all over RC Patrol, and you have beaten me numerous times to vandalism. STORMTRACKER94 Go Irish!20:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Days of Our lives template
I had made a new template, since the old one was messed up, if you chech carefully there is a blue bar which saids days of our lives, click on show and there is a new template, kindly delete the old messed up one underneath external links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.214.108 (talk) 13:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi SWik78,
Im not going to be as rude as the fella above but just like to ask as your so good and quick at reverting vandalism what tools are best in helping do this? Do you use the old school way or something like vandalproof or anyother ones out there. What do you think is best? Keep up the great work. Reply here, it will be easy. Thanks Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 04:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ha ha, thanks for agreeing to not be rude. I appreciate that.
As far as anti-vandalism tools are concerned, the only thing I actually use is rollback. I do most of my editing at work and I don't really want to bog down my work computer with any non-work related programs so I just monitor recent changes and use rollback. I've never tried Vandalproof or Twinkle or any of those type of tools but they it sounds as though they're pretty good for getting the job done. It sounds like you're fishing for some information on what tool you should use to increase your arsenal in vandal fighting and I think that is very comendable, good for you. It seems as though you're using rollback as well and you're doing a very good job so far.
I'm sorry I couldn't be of more help and I do apologize for taking this long to answer you but I was away from any computers for the last 3 days and this is the first time I've even checked my email. Anyways, I will try to be more helpful in the future so feel free to approach me if you wish.
i am wondering why dietrick vasquez is being deleted because i believe that article about him is important because he is a extremely amazing citizen who is a respectable figure in our fair city thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synystergates2011 (talk • contribs)
Ashinas
Hello
I have coorected my entry on Ashinas, pointing now directly to the Abbasid general, and not mainly to the Turkish clan name
Actually i've been using wikipedia for quite sometime but untill somedays back had cared little to contribute to it. Thanks for your welcoming words i will try to participate more actively in wikipedia family. Thanks again.Spariant (talk) 17:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Swik78. I would just like to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on most of my user pages today. Maybe i should have requested then to be protected earlier :D. Didnt have a clue that was heading my way though :S. Thanks again. ·Add§hore·Talk/Cont18:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, what happened was apparently an edit conflict...I most certainly did NOT write any of the text that you claim I did. I edited it out, but got a page saying something about an edit conflit, so I saved again. Apparently the vandalism was still in my second save, therefore you mistakenly assumed that I wrote the vandalism. Go further back in the edit history and you'll see that I am, in fact, correct. You really need to stop assuming bad faith. 71.221.19.132 (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have just deleted an article which took me a long time to write. Please can you give me a chance to see the text written on the Micheal Appleby article so it doesn't go to waste and i can use it somewhere else e.g Microsoft powerpoint (not Wikipedia). Thank You. Shakaib (talk) 19:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aww! Yay, I'm your favorite! I was getting very jealous at Fut.Perf. before I got to your almost reply :D I hear you about the closing the window before hitting save on a flip comment though, I do that all the time, for better or worse :/ Yeah, just from this morning, I feel like vandalism is worse than when I left! Must be my imagination or the time of day though, right? But yeah, that's an all-important ratio, we better hope it stays favorable. We should work to make being on the right side of the battle more rewarding for people! See you :) delldottalk15:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maslenica Operation
Dude,how can you count military personel that died during a battle as victims of warcrimes???
I don't get it.The weren't executed of something like that.It can stay as long you find a credible refference for that,otherwise it has to go.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 16:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Jesus Christ,you're talking about 500 people?!??!--(GriffinSB) (talk) 16:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the kind words. By the way, it was my pleasure to place that template on your talk page. Thanks again. SWik78 (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
why I am not able to edit the Primus Canada Wiki,
i am using reference --> not copying
i am providing information about the company that are not advertising related or putting down the competitors
