User talk:Kanonkas
I'm a bit confused as to your rationale for deletion of this article. G1 is for articles that are unsalvageably incoherent with no meaningful content or history. I don't believe it qualifies under those criteria. Granted, the article is short, but it's still readable. Wouldn't this one about no context be a better choice? --Cyrus Andiron 14:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk pageDo you like my colours, or do you prefer others? Drop me a note and I'll try and fix something up tomorrow :) Thanks for the compliment :) Tiddly-Tom 19:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
More ideas! Tiddly-Tom 16:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for the welcome!
User:202.170.84.2Geez, they really were persistent on you, weren't they? I had to revert 4 times in like 2 minutes. :/ Well, I had an admin block them for you (alerted on IRC), they won't be editing for the next two weeks. I'd have done it, but I'm lacking a mop. Anyway, I'm glad I could help, and I'll keep an eye on your page. Let me know if there's anything I can help you with. Cheers, Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 11:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)  You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Leak on Vegas 2Hi there, I was wondering why you got rid of the section called "Leak" on the Vegas 2 article. As I mentioned earlier in my edit summary, leaks are mentioned in other games, such as Half-Life 2 (scroll to the bottom). The leak is significant in that it doesn't have CD-key protection, which means that anyone who pirates the game can play online... illegally, of course, but Ubisoft protection can't check against it, because the leak was a near-Gold leak, but not completely. I was working to cite such information, but with you deleting the section of the post... Well, I'll wait for your explanation first. Neil the Cellist (talk) 13:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
My RfA...Thank you...
...for your participation in my RFA, which closed with 85 supports, 2 neutrals and 1 oppose. I'm extremely grateful for all the the kind comments from so many brilliant Wikipedians I've come to respect and admire, as well as many others I've not yet had the pleasure of working with, and I'll do my best to put my shiny new mop and bucket to good use! Once again, thank you ;) EyeSerenetalk 17:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Re: Your message on User talk:75.22.65.170I noticed you left a warning message about this user vandalizing my talk page which I appreciate. This vandal is on a dialup service and was hitting an article hard using multiple IPs. I blocked each one then protected the article. He retaliated against my talk page with 2 different IPs and I blocked both, then protected my page. I deleted one edit from my history due to the comment in the history. I deleted the talk pages he used, including the one you commented in, as he will never go back to them and the warnings will be meaningless to other anon users that might use those IPs in the future. Just letting you know what happened. --NrDg 18:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Your a quick one!Im sorry bro. Just playin around. Your good at your job, policing wiki, keep up the good work =] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Im baal (talk • contribs) 14:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC) AASECT articleHi there, I'm a bit new at this so forgive me...but I'm not clear on why an article about a professional organization would be marked as an advertisement? I know it could be longer/have more info on it, but I used other articles about professional organizations as a guide and even after rereading it, I don't see anything that seems "promotional" at all? I'd be happy to take anything that comes off that way out, but deleting the entire article seems excessive to me. Help please! Thanks, Sarah Paterson Sarah Paterson (talk) 17:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome!thank you for the welcome. do you know where I can get templates like the ones on this discussion page and on tiddley toms page? Thanks again, Dav42 (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Your VandalProof ApplicationThank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kanonkas. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand 04:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Rfa thanksThanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting my subpage. I appreciate it. Kaleal92 (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC) Thank YouThank you for watching over my talk page :) Tiddly-Tom 17:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Hey, thanksThanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. :)
VandalismSorry for that vandalism! I went to take a shit and when i came back my coworkers were fucking around with my wikipedia account. Those assholes are going to get what's coming to them. If you'll notice when I came back I caught them in the act and started to revert some of the changes they did on my account. Ask D.N.A.- Peter Napkin (talk) 19:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
