Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl in a Coma

Girl in a Coma

This article itself is clearly advertising and the first two sources are not reliable in the slighest (not indepenent certain;ly) and the third one isn't much either Weygander (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources aren't all that great and fall short of WP:RS. Band fails WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did anyone attempt to search for other reliable sources? Please remember that Wikipedia guidelines ask that we first do that before nominating an article for deletion. Here are a few: Dallas Observer Austin Chronicle Windy City Times Unrated Magazine Los Angeles Times L. A. Weekly Curve magazine. And so on. There's enough for a keep under WP:N or WP:MUSIC criterion #1. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability isn't the same as number of sources and is based on the candidate page not the deletion page. --Lemmey talk 18:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seem notable enough for mine given Paul Erik's sources. Capitalistroadster (talk) 06:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]