Jump to content

Talk:Asaram

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rohitom (talk | contribs) at 09:07, 18 June 2008 (→‎Neutrality????). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconIndia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

a very informative article on india and spirituality. Thanx to wikipedia !(Rohitom (talk) 09:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)).[reply]



this looks like a propaganda article for a TV personality.. This guy claims to have attained self realization?? This guy has to be a fraud.


128.125.20.94 (talk) 08:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC) hi this is anu787 can u tell me some thing more abt these saints and all actually i want to know each and every thing abt this[reply]


Hi Anu, Ask me what do you want to know. If I start talking about saints each one of them is an ocean in themselve. And we have so many of them in our life, we just need to decide who is the one who can change me to think positive and achieve some thing in life and that something is not physical its spiritual because all if you give all the materialistic things of the world to one person you cant make him happy but you can make a person happy by making him realise that he is happy. Ask me some specific questions if you want to know. I would be happy to answer any of the question to best of my knowledge. Rohit 21:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign any comments that you add here. Rohit 08:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we be specific about the neutrality issue please. If you have something to discuss please write it here before putting in the NPOV. Rohit 13:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I have removed the section Sri Asaramayan and its now available a saperate page. Rohit 11:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone help with the neutrality banner coming up on the top of the article. What does that means and why it is coming up again and again. The person who is doing it is not putting anything in the discussion page. Thanks. Rohit 11:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The banner is intended to show that the article is not written in a neutral point of view, a lot in the article is written from one POV, leaving out other points of view. The tone in which it is written also reflects this. Sfacets 11:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And why did you remove the Indic Fonts Banner. Regarding the references I was editing the article at the same time providing all the required citations. So please don't change the article. Rohit 11:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide an edit summary when you make changes. Also, please keep in mind WP:NPOV. Sfacets 12:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you got what you were looking for. I also left NPOV as it is. Can you suggest on the NPOV further. Thanks. Rohit 13:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a very informative article on india and spirituality

a very informative article on india and spirituality. Thanks to wikipedia !

Neutrality????

THis article is a glorification of the person. statements like "The young & the old, the rich & the poor, the atheist & ardent, all find Bapuji approachable" are not needed. He is "a saint" is disputable. He can best be described as a Hindu guru.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. The para, "The young & the old, the............" has been removed, as it seems glorification.
  2. He is a saint is not disputable. Hinduism believes in saintly-hood while living, while as per some other faiths a person can be declared saint after death. Being saint is as per faiths and Hinduism believs in saintly-hood while living.
  3. The person who is followed by people of all faiths can't be best described as a Hindu guru. I disagree even on this issue.--rohitom (talk) 09:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]