Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceri James

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cerijames (talk | contribs) at 18:54, 20 June 2008 (→‎Ceri James). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ceri_James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

In this article Ceri James describes himself firstly as a singersongwriter - there is another singersongwriter called Ceri James it therefore causes confusion. Also the Ceri James listed here although he is a writer he works under different names like Kezzatron and with a band called The mountaineers and he doesn't use the name Ceri James. He works mostly as a session musician not as a singersongwriter under this name therefore the article is misleading. The other singersongwriter Ceri James not listed here has released an album under the name Ceri James.


This article also shouldn't be about an individual it's against Wikipedia policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerijames (talkcontribs) 2008/06/13 00:10:25 (UTC)

I think alot of the aticles about bands and musicians on wikipedia are done by the band members or musicians themselves. They shouldn't do this it should happen organically. There seem to be quite a few articles that should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerijames (talkcontribs) 20:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What??? It's not relevant that the article might have been done by the person themselves or by their best friend. Of course it's relevant it's the most relevant question you can ask. Also If the ordinary boys is made up of session musicians then it wouldn't be a band - it would be Preston's backing band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerijames (talkcontribs) 21:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it isn't relevant who wrote the article. This is about policies, guidelines, and quality of the specific article in question. "Self-written" articles are not Verboten, just not encouraged. Perfectly reasonable, encyclopedic, and neutral articles can be written even by the subject (it's just that many don't bother). Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't think people should write their own history as a general rule(isn't that what the Nazi's did). But whatever, I already spoke to Ceri James a few years back who quite possibly wrote this article himself - I don't know. I think he was a bit worried there would be confusion about the name that's why he wrote to me. The problem is that it causes too much confusion. He used to be in a band called The Mountaineers(not sure if he still is I think he left) he is not a solo singersongwriter under the name Ceri James. His own solo project is called something else so he should write that name onto wikipedia. Also he wasn't in the Ordinary Boys original line up I think he was drafted in a as a session musician - and the Ordinary Boys don't even exist now. If he's mainly a session musician he should state that otherwise it could mislead people. My own solo album under the name Ceri James is in all major record stores and downloads. It's registered for the chart and I'm a member of the PRS. This article uses Ceri James myspace but I actually have the CeriJames url on myspace he has another url for his solo project under a completely different name. I think for the benefit of both parties the article either needs to be ammended or deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.15.164 (talk) 15:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete despite the drama surrounding this I've decided to way in. I don't believe the Mountaineers meet notability criteria (based on the content of their article), which would mean that the subject of this article doesn't meet WP:MUSIC (unless all members of notable bands are notable - in which case I'm wrong). Problem is from looking around I don't think the "other Ceri James" (the nom) meets the criteria any better under that name based on searches I've been able to do. I say delete and protect (as it is easy enough to request unprotection if either of the two (or both) prove to be notable in future. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Additional and if I'm out of order feel free to tell me constructive and civil way on my talk page. I'd like to request that User:Cerijames sticks to discussing the article itself and the policies and guidelines which mean it needs to be deleted as at the moment it looks like a he isn't as important as me arguement which doesn't help the article or wikipedia in anyway. Thanks. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a question of he isn't as important as me - people have a right to know accuate information - this article doesn't really provide that. I tried to edit this article to explain who I am and that we are two different people not one and the same but that got deleted by someone on wikipedia. If wikipedia keeps supplying inaccurate, incomplete or poorly researched information no one will take it seriously. Any person who looks up this article couldquite easily end up assuming we are the same person. As I said I don't know all the procedures and guidlines but it needs amending or deletion end of.