User talk:68.111.172.226

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

68.111.172.226 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been wrongly accused of being something I am not by Admins who are clearly trying to keep anyone from the outside from editing the Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California article. Check user me, anything. I dont even have the same IP address as the accused user I am claimed to be based on that persons block list. I was unfairly blocked by bitter, overcontrolling admins who, I feel, are corrupting their power to keep complete control over articles.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been wrongly accused of being something I am not by Admins who are clearly trying to keep anyone from the outside from editing the Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California article. Check user me, anything. I dont even have the same IP address as the accused user I am claimed to be based on that persons block list. I was unfairly blocked by bitter, overcontrolling admins who, I feel, are corrupting their power to keep complete control over articles. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been wrongly accused of being something I am not by Admins who are clearly trying to keep anyone from the outside from editing the Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California article. Check user me, anything. I dont even have the same IP address as the accused user I am claimed to be based on that persons block list. I was unfairly blocked by bitter, overcontrolling admins who, I feel, are corrupting their power to keep complete control over articles. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been wrongly accused of being something I am not by Admins who are clearly trying to keep anyone from the outside from editing the Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California article. Check user me, anything. I dont even have the same IP address as the accused user I am claimed to be based on that persons block list. I was unfairly blocked by bitter, overcontrolling admins who, I feel, are corrupting their power to keep complete control over articles. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

---