Jump to content

User talk:68.111.172.226

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.111.172.226 (talk) at 05:10, 22 June 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In addition to being a sock, the user violated WP:3RR. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As did your little friend, ArthurRubin. 68.111.172.226 (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
3RR doesn't count when reverting vandalism, such as yours. Check the policy...  X  S  G  02:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think his edits were unsourced, but not vandalism. The exemption that Arthur mentioned was block evasion. PhilKnight (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
People are accusing me of evading a block, and have given no proof!!!! What is this? 68.111.172.226 (talk) 05:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

68.111.172.226 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been wrongly accused of being something I am not by Admins who are clearly trying to keep anyone from the outside from editing the Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California article. Check user me, anything. I dont even have the same IP address as the accused user I am claimed to be based on that persons block list. I was unfairly blocked by bitter, overcontrolling admins who, I feel, are corrupting their power to keep complete control over articles.

Decline reason:

By your own admission, you were revert warring. — PhilKnight (talk) 02:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

68.111.172.226 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well, then I will take the punishment for 3rr, but I will NOT take the punishment for being a sockpuppet because I am not one. What I did was clearly not vandalism, and ArthurRubin is clearly trying to find his way out of something he did as well. He has no source that it was vandalism, he just didn't like the content or the editor. Please, reduce my block from an unconfirmed sock to 3rr.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Well, then I will take the punishment for 3rr, but I will NOT take the punishment for being a sockpuppet because I am not one. What I did was clearly not vandalism, and ArthurRubin is clearly trying to find his way out of something he did as well. He has no source that it was vandalism, he just didn't like the content or the editor. Please, reduce my block from an unconfirmed sock to 3rr. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Well, then I will take the punishment for 3rr, but I will NOT take the punishment for being a sockpuppet because I am not one. What I did was clearly not vandalism, and ArthurRubin is clearly trying to find his way out of something he did as well. He has no source that it was vandalism, he just didn't like the content or the editor. Please, reduce my block from an unconfirmed sock to 3rr. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Well, then I will take the punishment for 3rr, but I will NOT take the punishment for being a sockpuppet because I am not one. What I did was clearly not vandalism, and ArthurRubin is clearly trying to find his way out of something he did as well. He has no source that it was vandalism, he just didn't like the content or the editor. Please, reduce my block from an unconfirmed sock to 3rr. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}