User talk:68.111.172.226

In addition to being a sock, the user violated WP:3RR. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As did your little friend, ArthurRubin. 68.111.172.226 (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR doesn't count when reverting vandalism, such as yours. Check the policy... — X S G 02:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think his edits were unsourced, but not vandalism. The exemption that Arthur mentioned was block evasion. PhilKnight (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd consider the re-introduction of information that has been repeatedly struck from the article for lack of a source as "Sneaky Vandalism". This user has also performed sneaky vandalism by removing the {{fact}} tags from these same entries without providing a source. If you look at the individual edits, they do, indeed, look like a simple addition of unsourced information. If you instead look at the pattern of behavior over time, the vandalism becomes crystal clear. — X S G 07:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People are accusing me of evading a block, and have given no proof!!!! What is this? 68.111.172.226 (talk) 05:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are strikingly similar to a previously-blocked individual (compare this edit performed by 68.111.172.226 to this edit performed by 75.43.198.86). We weren't born yesterday, and we're not falling for it, just like we haven't fallen for it the last eight times you've tried to pull this nonsense. You can change your IP address all you like; the POV of your edits will always give you away, Eric. — X S G 07:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you people talking about? I dont even live in Anaheim Hills, I live in Escondido.68.111.172.226 (talk) 08:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

68.111.172.226 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, then I will take the punishment for 3rr, but I will NOT take the punishment for being a sockpuppet because I am not one. What I did was clearly not vandalism, and ArthurRubin is clearly trying to find his way out of something he did as well. He has no source that it was vandalism, he just didn't like the content or the editor. Please, reduce my block from an unconfirmed sock to 3rr.

Decline reason:

you have obviously edited before. If you want us to even consider an unblock you need to tell us the name of the account — Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.