User talk:Metagraph
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
If you are here regarding a revert I have made to an edit, take a look at it yourself. If it violates any Wikipedia policy, that was why it was reverted. This mainly includes WP:NPOV, WP:NOT, WP:COI, WP:NOTE, and WP:VERIFIABLE. Please read and understand these before requesting a reason, or ill be very unhappy. Alternatively, if you are adamant it is not vandalism, use common sense and re-add it.
I reserve the right to remove resolved conflicts from my talk page. Talk page will be archived monthly.
- Sorry, can't delete or clear a block log, but my unblock reason of "Huggle conflict" should be painfully clear to anyone looking at it that you did nothing wrong. Feel free to loudly curse my name at a future RFA. MBisanz talk 09:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
The Chris Willis Page
I'm not sure why you have against chris willis. But his quite notable in fields and deserves more credit. I'll person write his page, but please don't delete it because you are not aware of his notability as simple google search or you tube search would return notable hits. He's a popular icon in the dance house music industry and is the voice behind every David Guetta number 1 song. Give the guys some credit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.55.249 (talk) 06:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- The edits made by the above user were not vandalism. From the lead of Wikipedia:Vandalism: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." The edits were however copyvios from his MySpace page. Be careful when calling edits vandalism. ~ Eóin (talk) 02:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, this diff. ~ Eóin (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Skillz
The edit was relevant. I even included a citation to the interview from which I gathered the information. 68.229.185.47 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)