Jump to content

Talk:Zipporah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 72.82.76.179 (talk) at 00:12, 1 July 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconJudaism Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is clear in the Bible that Tzipporah is the Kushite wife. Took anti-black bias out.

It isn't debated because of any percieved anti-black bias. It is debated simply because it clearly says that Zipporah is a Midianite. Midianites are not Cushites (for one thing they are substantially whiter). So either the Cushite is a different person, or Cushite is metaphorical.

Why then was her doll from the Pixar movie "The Prince of Egypt" a dark skinned Black woman

Zipporah is the cushite wife

Until some credible evidence is shown as to why it should be considered "unclear", im keeping that speculative comment out.

Modern scholars doubt it. That's why it's back, as part of NPOV. Jayjg (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Why is your uncited statement any better than his? Which modern scholars are we talking about?   —Chris Capoccia TC 20:00, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
It is also unclear how deep is the scepticism of the scholars you are referring to. Are they merely doubting Zipporah's nationality/race? Are they doubting her existence? Are they doubting Jethro's existence? Are they doubting the entire record of the book of Exodus?   —Chris Capoccia TC 14:38, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
Cited; see page. Jayjg (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]