Jump to content

User talk:Kodster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kodster (talk | contribs) at 21:17, 4 September 2008 (→‎Thriller time: cmt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.




This is the user talk page for Kodster, where you can send messages and comments to Kodster.
Be polite
Assume good faith
No personal attacks
Be welcoming



I would like to markedly improve the page Karl Sipfle, which was deleted. I would like to see the deleted page. Please help me with that. Thank you. -KS

Ksipfle (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kodster can not do this. He is not an administrator. He can not view deleted text and thus can not grant your request. Please ask an administrator. Thank you for your polite request.--Xp54321 (Hello!Contribs) 18:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Xp is right. Unfortunately, I cannot do this for you. Here's a list of administrators who can help you with your problem. Good luck, and happy editing!
Also, the title is not the place to leave the comment. The title is a few words about what your comment's about (think of it as the "Subject" line in an email). Your comment goes under your title, followed by your signature. Cheers! Kodster (heLLo) (Me did that) 23:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thriller time

Hi Kod, Thriller is at FA again and it's looking good. It just needs another copy edit/check by another editor. I didn't wanna disturb you since you appear to be busy in real life but I've already asked everyone else I can think of. If you can help it's appreciated. — Realist2 14:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm crossing my fingers on Thriller! And I'll be glad to do a copyedit for you, R2 (as long as I get to have another little star on the corner of my page). ;-) Kodster (heLLo) (Me did that) 20:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'm done. The article has a lot (a lot) of good info, is well-written (to my knowledge), is sourced well, has good pictures, meets FA requirement in my eyes. I'll try to make time for a more in-depth look for the FA review, but it looks like a green light as far as copyediting goes. Good luck, bud! Kodster (heLLo) (Me did that) 21:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]