User talk:Thivierr

CHRC

After a bit of contemplation, I agree with your position on the format of this article. My apologies for any trouble our conflict may have caused. Frank Pais (talk) 14:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No sweat, thanks. --Rob (talk) 20:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DumZiBoT bare references

Hi. As far as I can tell, there's been no response from NicDumZ about the 'bare references' - either on his talk page or on Bot owners' noticeboard. I'm wondering how you see this now? Perhaps it's all too much of an effort given the environment? If you have a moment I'd be interested to know your opinion. --Klein zach 04:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I don't really see that there's any more for me to do or say. I suspect there won't be much support for a change, until more users see some problems in their articles. --Rob (talk) 04:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Christian evangelist scandals

Hello, just a friendly note to ask you to please be more careful when using Twinkle. This edit you reverted as vandalism here when it was definitely a good-faith edit [1]. Cheers... justinfr (talk/contribs) 11:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I shouldn't have labelled it vandalism and am sorry for that. I saw something that seemed like an attack without source (before you added one later). If I see a similar unsourced statement in the future, I'll still remove it immediately, but I'll avoid the term "vandalism", as it doesn't meet our definition of the term. --Rob (talk) 15:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I agree--at first blush it did look like an attack. I probably would've thought the same, but I happened to see it in the news a few days ago so it was easy to find a reference. justinfr (talk/contribs) 16:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hamblen HomeLogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hamblen HomeLogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Use

Hey Thivierr, I'm working on a project for ER nurses around calgary, and you're the author of almost all the good pictures of any hospital around calgary posted on Wikipedia. I looked at the GDFL licensing, but I thought I'd check with you, if it's alright for me to use your images of the hospitals/medical centres around in a slide show to be presented on Wednesday, October 8th.

How are you with sports photography? Interested in taking some pictures during the 2009 Alberta Open at the Oval in January? Just throwing that out there, let me know what you think.

Thanks! Ard0^{(Talk - Contribs)} 07:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]