Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrienne Papp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.189.78.123 (talk) at 22:14, 13 November 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Adrienne Papp

Adrienne Papp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Clear self-promotion as every external link has a connection to her (WP:BIO requires verification with citation from independent reliable sources); in places, this reads as a resume; at other places, it reads like a magazine article. Prodded, tag removed by User:Oo7565. B.Wind (talk) 05:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete - but that's mostly opinion. Article is very promotional, and comes off as WP:COI. At best, rewrite it. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changes have been made to begin process of making more Wiki correct article. Self-promotion aspects and excessive external links toned down. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.49.45 (talk) 20:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]
  • Delete fails the third party coverage criteria. Very limited coverage as indicated by Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 01:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree with Michellecrisp - fails 3rd party and is a pretty clear example of self-promotion. But, if article is retained, will need a thorough rewrite. Twilight1701 (talk) 17:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per Wiki, regarding biographies of living persons: "Page deletion should be treated as a last resort, with the page being improved and remedied where possible and disputed areas discussed." Ms. Papp's article and biographical information can be verified via her personal website referenced on the page. Per Wiki, regarding using the subject as a self-published source: "Subjects may provide material about themselves through press releases, personal websites, or blogs." Granted the page previously failed the test of perhaps leaning toward the "unduly self-serving" provision, but the page has been re-written with a more factual tone.