Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legion of Dynamic Discord

In-universe presentation of an aspect of this obscure religion. No outside references to establish notability. Pcap ping 20:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 20:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Jclemens (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. My hunch is that this is unsalvageable, and, as currently written, it is entirely to in-universe and POV to be understandable by an outsider. In other words, not encyclopædic. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 20:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Discordianism. The "in-universe" criticism seems out of place, as, strange as it may be, Discordianism is a phenomenon in the real world, not a fictional universe. However, the article does not demonstrate that this sect has independent notability from the mother religion, so an independent article is probably not warranted. gnfnrf (talk) 04:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
comment without respect to the article's suitability, "in-universe" seems misapplied here. To say that items of religious mythology/movements should be presented "out of universe" seems to imply you have to take an antagonistic POV: assuming it's pure myth first and addressing things from that framework. 129.89.68.62 (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]