Talk:Little Chute Windmill
![]() | Wisconsin Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
POV
Kermit814
Knock yourself out on the POV issue, although I tried to cut out obvious cases and thought that it generally just presented facts.
Jhuiting (talk) 19:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm just saying we'll have to be careful here. The windmill does not even exist yet and the article already includes features such as trails which haven't even fully entered the planning stage yet, much less funding. Also, it's not like the windmill is being entirely welcomed into the community with open arms. There have been controversies from the start about everything from public funding to location. The article is a good start and I'm a big fan of your anti-vandalism on other Fox Valley wiki-pages. Just make sure that the site remains not only informational, but balanced and realistic.
Kermit814 (talk) 19:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
NRHP
What is the historical district for this? If it doesn't exist how can it be on the NRHP? The only two districts I see for Little Chute are Little Chute Locks and Canal Historic District and Cedars Lock and Dam Historic District. --Dual Freq (talk) 03:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
It needs to be fixed. It was going to be adjacent the canal, but no longer is that the case. Jhuiting (talk) 01:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC)