User talk:Knotslanding

Protected

I have protected your talk page as you are clearly abusing the unblock process by merely copying and pasting the same rationale despite being shown where you have violated 3RR. Also, WP:3RR is very clear that the reverts do not have to be to the same content. --Smashville^talk 06:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Whatever. You know damn well I did not violate the 3RR rule. but whatever either way had NO BUSINESS even sticking their nose in the monorail article. But yet they kept on harassing me until they convinced other s that I was a danger and got me blocked. This it to either way and the other so called moderators that came in harassed me on the 24th of Dec. DO NOT TALK TO ME, DO NOT LEAVE MESSAGES IN MY TALK PAGE. I WILL NOT READ THEM AND I WILL DELETE THEM. If you have something to say. go tell it to your little group of friends. Knotslanding (talk) 22:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Knotslanding, you have been warned by several administrators that your behaviour is not acceptable (cf. [1], [2] and [3]). Despite this clear warnings, you started edit warring immediately after your block on the same article again ([4]). In addition to that, your are clearly violating WP:CIVIL: [5], [6]. This behaviour (edit warring and incivility) can not be tolerated. Thus, I am going to block you for 3 days. If you continue behaving like this in the future, this will result in an indefinite block. — Aitias // discussion 22:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh Bull. This is crap and I am going to file a report on you as well for this. I have done NOTHING wrong and you know it. What the heck are you either ways little pimp when they go around harassing people, you step in and block the person for fighting back? I will be making phone calls about this. You both are abuse of power. Knotslanding (talk) 22:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

In 3 days I WILL come back and RE FIX the incorrect information in the article. Knotslanding (talk) 22:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but that is not the case. As has been stated before HeadMouse, your sockpuppets are not welcome here. --Kralizec! (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Good bye

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

EXCUSE ME???? Sock puppet???? I don't think so. REMOVE THIS NOW!! Knotslanding (talk) 23:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knotslanding (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET OF ANYONE. THIS BLOCK NEEDS TO BE REMOVED.

Decline reason:

Uh, no. And the legal threat below is noteworthy. seicer | talk | contribs 23:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will be making phone calls about this Monday morning. Knotslanding (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Is that a legal threat as well? --Smashville^talk 23:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Did I say I was calling an lawyer??? Jesus Christ you people try to start trouble don't you. I will be calling Wikipedia. Knotslanding (talk) 23:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Knotslanding (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET. THIS ACCUSATION IS IN VALID WITH NO PROOF. THIS BLOCK IN UNJUST AS WELL.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET. THIS ACCUSATION IS IN VALID WITH NO PROOF. THIS BLOCK IN UNJUST AS WELL. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET. THIS ACCUSATION IS IN VALID WITH NO PROOF. THIS BLOCK IN UNJUST AS WELL. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET. THIS ACCUSATION IS IN VALID WITH NO PROOF. THIS BLOCK IN UNJUST AS WELL. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}