Jump to content

Talk:Centralizer and normalizer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by James.robinson (talk | contribs) at 07:46, 1 January 2009 (INtorduced Typo section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Mid‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

The statement:

  • The normalizer gets its name from the fact that if we let <S> be the subgroup generated by S, then N(S) is the largest subgroup of G having <S> as a normal subgroup.

is incorrect.

Let H = < s | s3 = 1 > the cyclic group of order 3.

Let G = <s, t | s3 = 1 , t-1st =s2 > an HNN extention of H which embedds H in the obvious way.

Let S = {s}. Then t-1st is not in S so t is not in NS(G). However it is contained in NH(G), which (since H=<S>) is the largest subgroup of G having <S> as a normal subgroup. Bernard Hurley 21:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Typos

I don't want to make the edit myself, in case I am mistaken, but in the first sentance:

In group theory, the centralizer and normalizer of a subset S of a group G are subgroups of G which have a restricted action on the elements of S and S as a whole, respectively. These subgroups provide insight into the structure of G.

Shouldn't it infact read:

In group theory, the centralizer and normalizer of a subset S of a group G are subgroups of G which have a restricted action on the elements of S and G as a whole, respectively. These subgroups provide insight into the structure of G.

James.robinson (talk) 07:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]