User talk:Potočnik

File:Yugoslav Passport Inside.JPG

Hey, I've noticed that the image File:Yugoslav Passport Inside.JPG appears in the article Yugoslav passport, captioned "Inside of a Yugoslav passport." I'm not sure how different the Yugoslav passport was, but to me the page looks like a Yugoslav Red Cross membership card. Even if it was indeed some part of the passport (who knows :)), I think a more prominent page would be a better illustration to the article. Best, Todor →Bozhinov 11:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

I've blocked you for a week for edit warring and complete failure to use the talk page at Republika Srpska. Furthermore, you are subject to a permanent WP:1RR restriction on that page. Furthermore, you are obliged to leave this message on you talk page for at least the next six months William M. Connolley (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian and Herzegovinian American

I do not see any proof of Bosnian American being the most common name, also I think that the American's use the name Bosnian and Herzegovinian or Bosnian-Herzegovinian or ethnicity of Bosnia and Herzegovina. There are also other categories which use both names. Why should we use a biased form of saying something when the NPOV is clear to both of us. -- Imbris (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh

Blocked again I'm afraid. 24h this time, edit warring on Serbophobia. See the AN3 thread William M. Connolley (talk) 22:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your disregarding IP 67.169.4.255 PRODUCER ^(TALK) 22:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) I've blocked one anon (and will consider the other). However, I can't see anything obvious tying the anon to O. If you're convinced, I suggest filing a WP:RFCU when your block expires William M. Connolley (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely will, see the suspicious behavior below

Regarding the Serbophobia article [1]

13:16, February 10, 2009 205.248.102.81 (Talk) (11,024 bytes) (Undid dude told you to put references instead of removal, what are you doing? revision 269778058 by PRODUCER (talk)) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 10:05, February 10, 2009 PRODUCER (Talk | contribs) (10,373 bytes) (Undid revision 269709914 by 67.169.4.255 (talk) WP:NOR) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 00:24, February 10, 2009 67.169.4.255 (Talk) (11,024 bytes) (Undid when questioning references instead of removing try adding sources needed revision 269664158 by PRODUCER (talk))

Regarding the Ratko Mladic article [2]

(cur) (prev) 00:22, February 10, 2009 67.169.4.255 (Talk) (18,168 bytes) (Undid unexplained undo revision 269661211 by PRODUCER (talk)) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 19:25, February 9, 2009 PRODUCER (Talk | contribs) (18,245 bytes) (Undid revision 269616435 by Onyxig (talk)) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 16:05, February 9, 2009 Onyxig (Talk | contribs) m (18,168 bytes) (cleaned up some minor edits) (undo)

Regarding the Karaǆić article [3]

(cur) (prev) 13:14, February 10, 2009 205.248.102.81 (Talk) (793 bytes) (Undid explain the undo? revision 269661173 by PRODUCER (talk)) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 19:25, February 9, 2009 PRODUCER (Talk | contribs) (903 bytes) (Undid revision 269616910 by Onyxig (talk)) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 16:07, February 9, 2009 Onyxig (Talk | contribs) m (793 bytes) (minor cleanup) (undo)

Not to mention all the edit warring when comes to the Republika Srpska article. These IP's only appeared and collaborate after I had a disagreement onyxig or an ip of his. PRODUCER ^(TALK) 22:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

seek help

I suggest we seek help from a third-party on the issue of the film "the hunting party". it is my view that our original research is when somebody puts uncited information.Serbian Defense Forces (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]