User talk:Baseball Bugs/Snapshot100130

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article nor the talk page for an encyclopedia article. Be aware that if you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mindless parrot. Be aware that the page may be inundated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself, if that. Be aware that this user likes to say "Be aware that..." Be aware that the original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Baseball_Bugs/Snapshot100130.

Ark-Hives

Useful warnings

Caution to vandals on WP:ANI: Don't get Plaxicoed.

Vandalism warnings

Matthew 7:6 - "Do not give dogs what is holy; and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under foot and turn to attack you." (Revised Standard Version)

Your proposition may be good / But let's have one thing understood / Whatever it is, I'm against it / And even when you've changed it or condensed it / I'm against it.

Proposed change to warning boxes inspired by another editor [1]

a compliant has been opended regarding youse behavieurs on WP:ANI. Please refrain from subtle vnadlaism.
No matter how subltel you think youa rebing you can e suiqt secertian that you are still commiting an act of vandlaism.
if you merely need an d outlet to practice editing please see WP:SANDBOX DINTRSTEAD of mutiliating articles on the mainspace ot violating articles here on wikipedia.
I hope you will return to make many mroe sponstructive edits in the future.
IF you require a sponsor, please see WP:SPONSOR to assit you in making many better editors into the near future.

Now, who can argue with that?
Not only is it authentic internet gibberish, but it expresses a courage that is little seen in this day and age.

Spam warnings

3RR warnings

Transients welcome

Letters from fans

BASEBALLS BUGS IS AN UGLY IGNORANT FOOL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.49.166.166 (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're stupid. Mayallld (talk) 01:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about that obviously immature Basebuggs? Tanninglamp 20:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehhehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe! ROFLMFAO! @ Baseball Bugs. That guy makes the dumbest jokes. You gotta love him for trying though. LMFAO! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA! =D Cheers! Cheers dude 05:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehehehehehehe! Baseball Bugs is a cutie. 65.31.103.28 05:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem? Why are you being a jerk? 69.14.244.157 (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You sir are an imbecile and a pervert. User:Jimihh aka User:Jimihendd 04:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CAUTION

Before you file any complaints here, be aware that I have an evil twin/roommate/friend who sometimes posts under my login.

This evil twin/roommate/friend also happens to be invisible and wears very soft shoes, so you never know when he/she/it/they will strike.

In fact, for all you know, I might be that evil twin/roommate/friend right now. >:) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 12:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

I have just now initiated an RfC for the Self-hating Jew article. Since you were once briefly involved as an administrator in the article, and since you are completely uninvolved in the issues; if you are willing to take a look and give an opinion on the situation, it might be helpful. (But, if you are disinclined, because of the rather messy situation, that would be understandable.) the RfC is here [2]. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 17:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an administrator. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 18:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I won't hold that against you. I know plenty of good people who are not administrators of anything. I actually intended this for another user. Clearly, I am trying to do too many things too fast today, so I think I better slow down. Sorry 'bout that. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling Stone Magazine

Actually, the article by Rolling Stone is quite good.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11818067/the_low_post_the_hopeless_stupidity_of_911_conspiracies

A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Pass the skewers! Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 01:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On page 2, Cheny refers to Rummy as "Dick", classic "mis-undirection". ;) — Ched (talk) 08:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bugs

← <Ched pokes the evil twin/roommate/friend> Being the new guy in town, I'm curious about some of the inside references. I've seen some posts that refer to a user "Who shall NOT be named", and while I'm guessing that would be one who starts with a G..(and ends with a)..p, I'm also wondering if the whole Willy on Wheels and Gwarp are/were the same user?, or is that something only the wiki-oldtimers are privy to? The second question stems from the my originally going to post in your "twin/roommate/friend" section, but seeing the {{clear tag}}. Is that something that just automatically deletes stuff in that section?, is it some sort of archive switch?, ... or does it provide some other function? Well, that's about all for now - just curious. — Ched (talk) 08:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That might be what they're referring to. Not being an admin, thankfully I don't have to deal with stuff like that continually. The "clear" simply means that anything after that starts at the left edge. I use it most often where there's a picture. Sometimes pictures are longer than text, and the next paragraph might start kind of scrunched up. "clear" ensures it will start at the left edge, after any picture. Just a mundane little technique for tidiness. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 09:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

noted, and thx. And, given you common-sense, I personally will give you every bit as much respect (if not more), than any of the admins. (Even if you weren't rooting for the Steelers, lol) Sometimes it's what you "don't" say that speaks louder than anything. In my short time here - there's been plenty of times I wish you could just "toss" some of the idiots from the nest. Cheers Bugs ;) — Ched (talk) 09:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that. :) I have found over time that where "idiots" (i.e. vandals and ultra-contentious users) are concerned, the best practice is, "Don't get mad, get even", by turning them in to the appropriate pages with appropriate documentation of behavior, and let the admins do their job. Edit wars are futile. Following policy usually works out for the best. Regarding the Steelers, I admire the way they run their organization. They were the dregs of the league for the first 30-40 years of their existence, and did a total turnaround in the 1970s. I can still remember that "Immaculate Reception" - one of the great moments in NFL history (except to Raiders fans, of course). And they showed the stuff they're made of in the Super Bowl. Down with a couple minutes left, and they came back to get the clincher. Great finish (except to Cardinals fans, of course - which I'm not, in general; just in this post-season). Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 09:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic seeing this, and remembering the sig from a few recent boards (and not always in a good way) - I'm thinking "fast track to block land". Oh well, enough chit-chat I guess, I should be working on the Study skills article. or The Shootist, or.. Twilight (1998 film), or just about anything productive. I see the "forum/not myspace police" casting an evil eye my way ;) — Ched (talk) 10:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball, sig? i have some additional links for you, but i cant post them here since I am not sure if they wuould work, is there email to contact you, if so, thanx!