Talk:Rhône Glacier

Glaciers Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland Stub‑class High‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

river rhon

وvvjfvkznxlvk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.210.33.111 (talk) 18:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no indication what the axes or lines represent. Xuehxolotl (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see it in the description of the graphic, but labels really should be part of the graphic. Xuehxolotl (talk) 21:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- even with with the description it doesn't mean anything. "-1,200"; minus from what? Is this unusual? Is this more or less than other glaciers. It seems like a pretty steady loss from whatever the baseline is. And I'm confused by what "leaving back a track of naked stone." means. 173.49.91.134 (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]