Jump to content

User talk:Potočnik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Serbian Defense Forces (talk | contribs) at 22:43, 5 March 2009 (→‎Trnopolje camp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Blocked again

I've blocked you for a week for edit warring and complete failure to use the talk page at Republika Srpska. Furthermore, you are subject to a permanent WP:1RR restriction on that page. Furthermore, you are obliged to leave this message on you talk page for at least the next six months William M. Connolley (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trnopolje camp

Hi Producer You did some substantial changes to this article, but did not explain why. Please explain on article talk pages or I will consider if your changes were appropriate. Best regards, Mondeo (talk) 13:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your constructive contribution to this article. Reason for my message is that your changes were not accompanied by explanations in edit summary or on talk page. Then it can be difficult to understand why you did the changes. Adding sources of course don't need extensive comments. Thanks. Mondeo (talk) 18:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for your excellent contributions to this article, but please write a summary of your edits, then it is easier for other editors to understand what is happening. Best, Mondeo (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Producer. I've just glanced over the changes you've made and without looking at them in detail I don't see anything obvious to argue about. I'd rather not get too involved just at the moment in looking at the Trnopolje camp article, important though it is, because of the effort involved in discussing issues relating to the Omarska camp article.

I would say however that it's worthwhile giving advance warning of changes on the Talk Page beforehand, as a matter of courtesy, however tedious the prospect may be of getting diverted by sad efforts to steer the article away from dealing unambiguously with substantive reality.

My personal preference is for listings under "See Also" but that's just my own inclination, I know other people find the Template boxes more useful, so thanks for that. Opbeith (talk) 10:04, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Producer, following up your Template box creation, it doesn't seem unreasonable to me that a Bosnian War Concentration Camps template might be created that groups together the concentration camps identified as such by Bassiouni (and any other equally authoritative sources). That doesn't necessarily mean that the existing titles of the Wikipedia articles relating to those concentration camps need to be changed but it would provide a reasonable focus for that discussion. I'm mentioning this idea because of your creation of the Bosnian War Camps Template Box but I'm afraid I'm not able to do anything about it myself because I've just got too much on my hands already at the moment, but I would be happy to support anyone who decided go ahead with it. Opbeith (talk) 11:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

.

You seem to start conflicts on pages in order to stop them from developing. Also, you seem to push a single anti-Serb view point.Serbian Defense Forces (talk) 22:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]