Jump to content

Talk:Sziklai pair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 89.136.39.53 (talk) at 22:32, 6 March 2009 (→‎Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconElectronics Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does anybody know the pronunciation of `Sziklai' ? `zIk-lay'? `tseek-lie'? Or something else? Thanks for help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tosendo (talkcontribs) 21:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm not mistaken, I guess it's something like seek-loy but better ask somebody who knows hungarian.89.136.39.53 (talk) 22:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Apass[reply]

Is it really true that PNP transistors were historically more scarce?

I have quite a few books from the times when germanium transistors were in their golden days (well, at least in russia and in the eastern europe) and I can see that PNP were the kings of the day, very few circuit diagrams were using germanium NPN transistors.
Anyway, even if this was not the case for germanium transistors, I still think that a citation is needed for this affirmation: To reduce the number of PNP transistors, which historically have been more scarce than NPN transistors.89.136.39.53 (talk) 22:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Apass[reply]