User talk:Russavia
Thank you for deleting the page I spent days and hours creating. And, as per my understanding, it did qualify as a Wikipedia article
| ПРЕВЕД! |
| Welcome to my talk page. Please leave me a message, alternatively you are welcome to email me. If you leave a message here for me and it requires a reply, I will reply here, so you may want to add my talk page to your watchlist. All users have my permission to remove any bot messages from my talk page at any time. |
|---|
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Russian embassy in Warsaw
Finally I managed to upload them :)
- File:Rusemb warsaw main building.jpg
- File:Rusemb warsaw consular section.jpg
- File:Rusemb warsaw consular section 2.jpg
- File:Rus high school warsaw.jpg
Masti (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Would you mind looking this one over again, as I have updated the article and greatly expanded it. Thanks -Marcusmax(speak) 02:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
I am sorry that the thread on AN is such an annoyance, I hope you and Biophys can patch things up. Here's something I hope you'll find more pleasant: some time ago I created an article on the Defense of Brest Fortress, but I am still surprised there is no ru interwiki. Can you check if there is indeed no such article on ru Wikipedia? Perhaps you would have some materials (photos...?) that could be used to improve this article? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- There isn't a dedicated article on ruwiki on this battle, but it is a subsection at ru:Брестская_крепость#Оборона Брестской крепости в 1941 году. I have added that as an interwiki link, as I think it is alright to link like that? Who knows eh? About photos, as it was after 22 June 1941, any photos from the battle would not be PD. The image used on ruwiki may be able to be used under some fair use. The only photo that I know of relating to the battle is this -- File:Dmitry Medvedev in Belarus 22 June 2008-4.jpg -- of Medvedev and Batka at the Brest Memorial, and perhaps a couple of others from commons:Category:Dmitry Medvedev in Belarus. Apart from those, I am totally clueless as to other photos that we may be able to use. It's these types of issues that make me even more inclined to approach the Russian Archives to get materials licenced under a free licence, this may be something I will try to work with the wikimedia-ru chapter on in future. --Russavia Dialogue 21:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Interwiki to subsections should be only temporary, perhaps you could stub a separate article on ru wiki? I know there is a museum at the Fortress; hopefully one day some Wikipedian will photograph the exhibits. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- So long as they are ok on a temporary basis that's cool with me. I've got a few articles I wanna get finished first before I worry about other things, when I've done those, I will have a look at perhaps just getting at least a start-class article done, with the basics. I'll ask a few others about photos too. --Russavia Dialogue 06:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Interwiki to subsections should be only temporary, perhaps you could stub a separate article on ru wiki? I know there is a museum at the Fortress; hopefully one day some Wikipedian will photograph the exhibits. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Reply
I crossed out my response at the talk page. Sorry for being excessively confrontational. You are welcome at my talk page if you want to discuss anything.Biophys (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
A question
I think there is a strong bias cast over you and I don't know why. My previous question seems to be still pertinent to this persistent sockpuppetry accusation by him[1] Can you give me a hint? Thanks.--Caspian blue 22:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- The answer to your question is a looooong and frankly it is a complete headf**k (I am getting one now even thinking about it). In September last year I was blocked attempted outing of Biophys after I placed a COI notice on his talk page; I still dispute that it was outting, but due to the bullshit that was going on at the time in relation to User:Miyokan it was construed as harrassment, rightly or wrongly. Anyway, I copped it on the chin and moved on. Since then, well, you can look at *to be fair I won't post it directly, but can be found in my userspace by using Special:PrefixIndex* that there has been a long sustained harrassment and wikihounding campaign by numerous editors. It isn't complete by any stretch of the imagination, so it could be quite unclear. I can say that in the last month there hasn't been any stalking by those editors, mainly due to myself pretty much restricting myself to researching and writing at User:Russavia/Slava Zaitsev and User:Russavia/Australia–Russia relations, in addition to small bits and pieces on other articles on my watchlist. But as to why? The answer is simple. I try to follow the advice given to me at User_talk:Ezhiki/2009#Can_you_provide_some_assistance_here_please as much as possible, and is partly why I am working on content in my userspace as of late. Of course, I am totally aware of discussions going on at places like User_talk:Digwuren#Are_you_able_to_help_with_this.3F (this is REALLY telling!!), User_talk:Digwuren#AE (funnily enough Biophys against raises the issue there too), User_talk:Colchicum/Archive#Trollfest (and again Biophys raises the issue), User_talk:Colchicum/Archive#Civility (and again). I realise that we are an encyclopaedia (apparently) and editors who are here to advocate do not like it, and I think it's great they don't like it. They hate the fact that I upload images to Commons; they hate the fact that I've created content that they don't like; they hate the fact that I will try to make articles NPOV, thereby getting rid of the rabid POV in many articles. And for all of this, I am a target, pure and simple. They can claim that I have caused all this, but that is a load of horseshit, because it has been like that in this area of editing for a looooong time. There is Wikipedia:DIGWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions which can be looked at. It isn't enough to simply look at the accusations of sharing my account/sockpuppetry/etc, but one has to look at conversations (such as those I have linked to above) in their entireity in order to understand what is happening. Even then it may not be completely clear. Hope this helps answer your question, if not, feel free to email me. --Russavia Dialogue 00:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ahmm.. what can I say...given the ANI thread, I truly think that the thick bias against you would not be gone for a while. You would better disengage in contacting with him...Best regards.--Caspian blue 04:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
notes to self - nothing to see here
Thank you for your contributions
Sorry man, but I do appreciate your work in WP. I like your article Koni (dog), as I clearly stated long time ago at the talk page (please see here). As about "passion" and "hard to swallow", that was something different. Colchicum said that you are so obssessed with Putin, this is something like a personality cult. I objected, telling him that his idea about you being so passionate is hard for me to swallow. Sorry for misunderstanding here. Well, I simply should not discuss anything about you, and I will not, unless someone starts an arbitration about you and me.Biophys (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)