Talk:Chinese intelligence activity abroad

Military history: Intelligence / Asian / Chinese Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-02-04. The result of the discussion was keep.

Why is this page promoting the Falun Gong? 152.163.100.14

Wow this is one of the sketchiest and POVist articles I've seen so far. Some of the information may very well be true but if so it needs to be substantiated. The article also needs copyediting and filling out. The information could probably be moved to Ministry of State Security Zarboki 10:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article doesn't actually "promote" Falun Gong...

NPOV tag

Since the AfD is now closed and the consensus seemed to be that the article is balanced, if nobody objects after a week I am going to remove the tag. Anybody who does object, I would happily engage in a constructive effort to improve the article.--ThreeAnswers 01:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wen Ho Lee

Strange discussion, in that has a screed about 'racism' (by the Clinton Administration?) and doesn't mention possibility of his spying for Taiwan.