Jump to content

Talk:A News (TV program)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 174.88.71.179 (talk) at 19:43, 6 May 2009 (→‎CHRO & CTV: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hey Bearcat what do you think of my New A-News Page that i created does it meet wiki guidelines

Let me know

(Dongwong (talk) 02:42, 8 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Keep the baqckground as that is part of the official Anews Logo

(72.1.206.186 (talk) 13:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Are you completely incapable of understanding the concept of background? The background that a logo is on top of is not part of the logo. That's what makes it background. Bearcat (talk) 19:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


well according to 'A' News it part of there logo

(72.1.206.186 (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Yeah, you also once claimed that "iqulit" was the only place in Northern Ontario that didn't get an A station over the air, so you'll have to forgive me if I don't take your word as reliable. Bearcat (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh really? If the background was really part of the logo, what would you call this video uploaded by "steve curwin" who miraculously appeared about a few minutes after you did on Viewers.ca and appeared before on Wikipedia, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dwddiqY9UM, at about 23 seconds in the video clip? The A News logo is used without the background because it's a background. Emarsee (TalkContribs) 23:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it staying and no buts about it

i wll keep reverting until it stays —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.206.186 (talk) 14:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not your choice to make. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes it is my choice to make i can make a complaint to Wikipedia Headoffice —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dongwong (talkcontribs) 13:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On what basis do you figure you're entitled to do that? You have no special right to dictate what the article should or shouldn't contain, so what do you honestly think you could say to the Wikimedia Foundation about this? Bearcat (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


well i could say i am not satisfield the way editors are reverting stuff that could improve the article.

plus my opinion is i am addign the A News Logo to show what there news intro has changed so muhc

i am also in the process if retreiving the Old a-Channel News intro icon to show how the news look intro has changed.

but if you keep reerting it i cant do that. Thank you Plus the Other 'A' Aricles have Station Presentation and why not have a news presentations which would have A-Channel NEws INtro Logo and the 'A' News INtro Logo

According to Wikipedia's fair use rules, such galleries are only permissible if the article actually contains a critical evaluation of the past logos themselves; simply displaying past visual identifications without some kind of critical commentary is a violation of standard copyright law. Bearcat (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CHRO & CTV

do you think considering that CHRO used Ottawa's News HOur and CTV ottawa used Ottawa's News Leader they were both tied in Ratings.


but as far as i know A ottawa news were cancelled due to protect 'A' Morning