Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pioneercourthouse

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EncMstr (talk | contribs) at 19:16, 27 May 2009 (→‎Report date 17:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC): followup). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Pioneercourthouse

Pioneercourthouse (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


Report date 17:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Barek

Very loud quacking coming from this account. These are the identical types of edits added by the sock accounts Vivianaponkhead (talk · contribs), Eeowbbb (talk · contribs), and Pleebusy (talk · contribs) to other articles.

Request a checkuser, as this particular sockpuppet has a long history of creating sleeper accounts to get around semi-protection of articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update, the sock Obleaop has now been blocked indefinitely. Still requesting a check for sleeper accounts due to past behavior of this puppet master to create sleepers, as the user has already created 6 known socks in the past 24 hours. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by - Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Mostly need a sleeper check and/or underlying IP check. An abuse filter has been put in place - by EncMstr (talk · contribs) - and turned on, and I am doing blocks on sight. Wknight94 talk 18:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk endorsed to check for sleepers. — Jake Wartenberg 18:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions

 Clerk note: All tagged. Icestorm815 • Talk 19:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Followup

Wow! Thanks! Take the rest of the day off: you've earned it. —EncMstr (talk) 19:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.

{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pioneercourthouse&oldid=292723449"