Talk:Canadian Americans

Personally I'd think French Canadian-Americains can actually be considered a separate group due to a different immigration/assimilation history in the US. Quebec diaspora and Little Canadas deals with this a bit.--T. Anthony 13:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone actually provide evidence for the use of this term outside of Wikipedia? Granted I have not read the book mentioned, but for all of my efforts I have been unable to find a single reference on the internet outside of Wikipedia which uses the term Canadian-American in the context of describing a person. The one external link is completely unrelated to the concept of someone being labeled "Canadian-American", and none of the article is referenced. Time to tag. JimboMaloi 07:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dual citizenship of Canadian Americans

Please see the Wayne Gretzky article. Wayne is a citizen of both America and Canada. He has lived in America for the last 20 years with his American family. However there are several like minded canadians who refuse to acknowledge his Canadian American status in the intro. They have an admin (Wknight94)that likes to ban people with different opinions. Can anybody help with this situation? Lex393384

I reviewed the discussion on that page and there seems to be a fairly convincing consensus that Gretzky is Canadian. This is also the mainstream, off-Wiki, consensus.

I also saw no evidence of anyone being banned for holding a different opinion. You should be careful, as an accusation like that could be considered a personal attack. If you have a problem with an admin's conduct, there are proper channels through which to raise them. - Eron ^Talk 17:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wknight94 banned George W. Gretzky for posting on the wayne gretzky discussion board. He also reverted the discussion to prior form. Wayne Gretzky became a US citizen 20 years ago, I think this would make him a Canadian American. George W. Gretzky was banned for sockpuppetry, however George W. G. has been forced to create new accounts to have his/her voice heard after being banned. Similarily after banning user Moosehead007, this was the message sent to him, "Suck mah nuts bitches." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.43.32.85 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:George W. Gretzky was banned as a sockpuppet, not for posting. Users who create new accounts to continue doing something that they have been banned for once are usually banned again. As to the "Suck" post, check the page history - that comment was left by an IP vandal, not by User:Wknight94. - Eron ^Talk 21:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV Dispute

I'm having trouble swallowing the paragraph:

"Canadian-Americans, as a group, desire to and do integrate and assimilate into American culture and society to a great extent; this is a result of the great similarities between Americans and Canadians culturally. It is the resultant visceral feeling among Canadian-Americans that have given rise to the self-identity of the group. Of course, as some French Canadians number among those whose self-identity in the United States is Canadian-American, it should be noted that in Canadian French, the term for Canadian-American translates to "Canado-Américaine"."

ink_13 19:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

same here Basser g 09:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. I know a lot of Canadian-American's (and I'm one), and I don't know anyone who would say that we "desire to ... integrate and assimilate". It's a ridiculous over-generalization.

Fair use rationale for Image:Star Spangled Canadians Simpson pbcoverimg.jpg

Image:Star Spangled Canadians Simpson pbcoverimg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

This article is pure hearsay, the information seems to come out of thin air. Where is the proper citations? Is someone just writing this as a joke? Thier arguments are weak at best , this seems to be written for seventh grade assignment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.87.253.38 (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian-American = Pleonasm

Isn't Canada in America anyway? Just like Mexico, Brazil and Argentina? Pablo (talk) 08:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

" the "most American" a Canadian-American could ever be, by definition, is one holding the legal status of being a naturalized U.S. citizen."

This is incorrect. Let's posit an American citizen moves to Canada, gains permanent resident status, and produces a daughter in Toronto. This child is a naturally born Canadian citizen due to her place of birth. The American parent has this daughter registered as an American born abroad. Thus the girl has dual citizenship. She is raised in Canada and eventually moves to the US for economic reasons as an adult. Wouldn't she be a "Canadian-American"? Wouldn't she also be a natural born US citizen? My understanding of the citizenship laws of both countries is that this is perfectly possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.83.138.204 (talk) 08:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In English, "American" generally means of or from the United States. I recognize that this is not the case in some other languages, but this is English Wikipedia. I doubt many, if any, Canadians living in Canada would consider themselves "Americans." 130.64.158.231 (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the above use "In English". A better term would be in "the provincial minds of many in the USofA." If America means only the USofA then North America is Alaska and South America is Florida.

No, but if they had US citizenship, even origins, the phrase "American Canadian" might be apt; both my parents had duality until opting for (or being forced to get) Canadian-only citizenship. Good thing, I guess, we would have been draft-eligible if we'd inherited it...anyway, I'd venture (speaking as a Canadian with American roots) that in the type of situations described by ip24.83.183.204 the person in question would consider themselves both; if in Canada with the "Canadian" second in the formation, and to e without the hyphen "feels" better. Such people exist aplenty, and there's also lots of Canadian citizens who had been Americans and/or American citizens and are naturalized Canadians; about themselves they'd most likely say "I'm a Canadian now, but I was raised in Ohio/Maui/Schenectady etc.". Which word order a person prefers is probably statistically related to which side of the border they were raised on, never mind the citizeznship qualifications; to which do they identify. To me a Canadian American (sans hyphen) would be an American with Canadian origins (Canadian ethnic/birth/inheritance origin, rather than "I had a Canadian passport for a few years"), or someone with duality who's living down there. Speaking of being the offspring of American Canadians, I'd also like to say that the hyphen just doesn't work; I'm an "unhyphenated Canadian" despite having American and six or seven other flavours in teh family....fine to do the sort thing with descriptive doublets, but can the hyphen, I hate it.Skookum1 (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meant to add that American is alost an ethnicity in Canada, especially historically in some areas, such as BC an dthe Yukon, often elsewhere in the West; all kinds of things from resource worker or business in-migrants to the draft dodgers, teachers, and whatever else; American roots are extremely common in BC and Aericans or people of American origin have distinguished themselves in BC's history; and that's not including Brits or iperiuals like Amor de Cosmos who was far ore Californian in ways and doings than he was a Maritimer, or Ma Murray and any number of celebrated miners and investors, as well as of course the prevalent American persence in the Kootenays; Toronto also I believe has a lot of American expats now, but BC has been this way since the place was founded. But people like Ma Murray and others might well drop all American identity (if not culture or accent; Ma was too outspoken for a lot of people, and she never lost her Kansas farmgirl drawl). I was actually gonna do a list b ut not enough articles are out there yet ot make it worth the bother....i.e. of notable Americans in BC's history/society/economy; important non-citizens like Kyle Washington or Mr. Hill of the Northern Pacific and so-and-so in the film or forestry biz, never naturalized Canadians. And I dcon't ean Goldie and Kurt or David Duchovny, but "major players". Whatever; there's certainly a need for a term, or terms, in either direction with the border; "Dual Canadian-American" would specify those with dual citizenship; it's a phrase I've heard, though I don't know if it's documentable.Skookum1 (talk) 00:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal Canadian Americans

Just happened to see this, so here's a quick story. A guy I knew, all too well actually, was Cherokee-Irish/Modoc-Irish (Kintpuash's great grandson in fact - he pronounced the name "Kintapush" I remember, sort of an anglicization I guess). When asked what his "nationality" was , in the way we used to use that term to mean background, where you were from ('cause most people or their folks usually were), he said "North American" r "Native North American"; he was from Quesnel BC as much as he was from Redding CA, nt sure if he had Canadian status 'cause that implies band membership and I don't think he had any Canadian-side, but he could live on either side of the border no matter what, er, he did. Mind you by the time I knew him he also had a diplomatic passport as a bodyguard for a prince. No kidding, and I wish there were something there that were citable ;-) and/or notable...can't even really say which country. I'll have to spin him into a novel or a script. "(Native) North American" as in "Asian", "European", African, "(Native) South American". Anyway X. weas a Canadian-American, in both directions (raised in Q-burg) and that's what he used. But he sorta made it up, 'tis true,...would be really hard to research/cite, if it's out there; instances of aboriginal people using it, that is........Skookum1 (talk) 06:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canadians in America (from the American-Canadian article)

This was found on the American-Canadian article on the number of Canadians residing in America is alot higher than Americans in Canada. Back in 2006, about 32,000 Canadians came to America, compared to 10,600 Americans going to Canada, the ratio of Canadians coming to America is usually 3 times that of American expatriates heading north to Canada. As the edit pointed out, this is a fact originated in the 2001 Canadian census and was indicated on the Sep. 2001 National Geographic article on immigration in the US (a world map shown the national origin of immigrants coming to the USA):

The number of Americans migrating annually into Canada is 3.5 times smaller than vice versa, the larger number of Canadians living in the U.S. are temporary residents known as "snowbirds" may have residences in the Southern half of the U.S. (i.e. Florida, the Carolinas, Southern Texas, Southern California and Arizona) during the winter months.

I corrected the part on "8 times" to the actual "3 and a half times" since that wasn't properly verified, unless the edit refers to the number of temporary residents who come to stay in the U.S. temporarily and return to Canada where they continue to hold national citizenship as Canadians. + 71.102.2.206 (talk) 07:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]