User talk:Dominus Noster

Welcome!

Hello, Dominus Noster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like List of fictional narcissists, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Passportguy (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of fictional narcissists

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of fictional narcissists, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

What constitutes "excessive pride" is highly subjective (e.g. the inclusion of Napoleon is bound to be controversial), thus this list in inherently POV

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of fictional narcissists

I have nominated List of fictional narcissists, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional narcissists (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Passportguy (talk) 14:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are being accused of sockpuppetry

Please note [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6]. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 22:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/YourLord. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 23:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is pathetic

I'M NOTHING TO DO WITH YOURLORD OR JUPITER OPTIMUS MAXIMUS OR WHATEVER THE BLOODY FELLA'S CALLED! UNBLOCK ME AT ONCE YOU MORONS! --Dominus Noster (talk) 11:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So it's just an incredible coincidence that you're the same age & gender, live in the same place, have the same editing patterns, & that your IPs track to the same locations? We do have pretty decent bullshit detectors. On your past talk pages you've been given a number of options for appealing your block. You've chosen to be a disruptive sockpuppeteer instead, and the community is done giving you leeway. --IllaZilla (talk) 18:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's an incredible coincidence! I've read your interactions with those other so-called editors on their talkpages and it's obvious that they've already made up their minds that I'm this person. Grrr, this is all your fault you paranoid Caligula! That article of mine never would have even been deleted if you hadn't come along! --Dominus Noster (talk) 21:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jupiter, cut the crap. Nothing here is "yours", and your lies couldn't be more transparent. We're done here. --IllaZilla (talk) 22:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was being metaphorical. I had created the article, hence my reference to it as "mine." I didn't mean I owned it, only that it was the fruit of my labours and it wouldn't have been deleted if you hadn't stuck your meddlesome oar in. You even make reference to me "having no wish to leave the dark side" when I have the moral high ground and from what I know of this Jupiter person, so did he. Granted he was a tad hot-headed and uncivil when crossed but then so was Winston Churchill. Collectonian or whatever he calls himself even says my defence was exactly the same as Jupiter's and I can tell you, I've read Jupiter's defence and it bore no resemblance to mine whatsoever. Additionally the investigation against me was rushed and hackneyed and probably rigged. --Dominus Noster (talk) 09:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and "we're done here"? Three personages are permitted to use the honorific of we: royalty, pregnant women and people with dissociative identity disorder. Which are you? --Dominus Noster (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So you attempt to deprive me of the right to use my talkpage. Well I've got to do something to pass the time on here haven't I! Injustice pisses me off. Being blocked for being the sockpuppet of another user when there's virtually no conclusive evidence to suggest that I am certainly seems to count as injustice. From what I've seem of WP:DUCK it's merely yet another excuse for admins and deletionists to shit over anyone who ruffles their feathers. --Dominus Noster (talk) 23:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]