Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Non-autoconfirmed posts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 75.21.124.148 (talk) at 12:44, 16 June 2009 (→‎Anna Anderson concerns brought to your attention). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


If you are blocked If you cannot post to a noticeboard because you are a new editor, post to this page
  • If you are blocked, please place {{unblock| your reason for unblock}} on your talk page.
  • Start a new thread under a heading using double equals-signs: ==Informative title==.
  • When you start a discussion about an editor, you must notify them on their user talk page.
  • Sign your posts using "~~~~" (four tildes), which is translated into your signature automatically.

Noticeboard archives
Administrators' (archives, search)
344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353
354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363
Incidents (archives, search)
1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152
1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475
476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485
Arbitration enforcement (archives)
317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326
327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336
Other links

N00b got pwned, and admin covered it up

See log summary. Didn't y'all learn from the last time this happened? Apparently not. Well, maybe yes. 129.49.7.125 (talk) 02:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll copy it to incidents as I'm curious but you'd get more respect if you wrote a little more maturely. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, there's a number of deleted edits by that user which match that of two other users. Not the best summary but I can live with it. It's not the same as the other incident. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry for the terseness. Basically "Go eat dinner, Jeremy" is an impolite log summary, especially given the possibility, however small, that the user might be someone other than Jeremy. 129.49.7.125 (talk) 06:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's a consistent pattern with a long-time vandal. It's not likely at all to be anyone else. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Anderson concerns brought to your attention

You will have seen the bloodbath at the admins' notification page concerning the abuses and hounding, occurring at Talk:Anna Anderson. "Alexius Horatius" has referred this to you. I am here to call to your attention the need for either moderation, arbitration or someone to step in, review all facts and delete Anna Anderson as it presently stands. Since a consensus was nearly reached there, two particular troublemakers began the insults and wikishouting all over again: aggiebean and finneganw. Soon enough you will be aware of my identity. Please help that mess! That is all I have to say.75.21.124.148 (talk) 12:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC) Editing to correct factual error.75.21.124.148 (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]