User talk:Mitchellandness1

Big Herk

Hi. Not only did the article lack content, it was already voted "off the island" in an articles-for-deletion discussion. - Lucky 6.9 03:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but if the subject has been deemed as unnotable, there isn't much that I can do since I'm bound as an administrator to block "problem" titles. Tell you what: I'll unblock it, restore it, add an "under construction" template and let you have at it. - Lucky 6.9 04:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. You're all set. I'll add an alert message on the talk page. - Lucky 6.9 04:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Herk, Rock Bottom Entertainment, and others

I've noticed quite a few of the pages you've created have been deleted or nominated for deletion. I'm actually trying to clean up some of the Detroit-based Rapper pages so they make a better case for meeting WP:MUSIC, WP:BIO, and WP:LOCAL and are not deleted or tagged for lacking verification. I'm also trying to get some of the formatting fixed so they are more in line with what a Wikipedia musical act page should look like. That said, you seem to know alot about this topic, so I could use your help with sources. For example, I added an info box to Big Herk, but I can't find any information about what his birthdate is, so if you know of a website, etc that has his birthdate I'd like to add it. Also, if you know of other Detroit-based rapper pages, mention them on my talk page and I'll try and clean them up. Hopefully these can be fixed up so they don't get deleted anymore.--Isotope23 15:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Jayzblueprint3.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Jayzblueprint3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Jayzblueprint3.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Jayzblueprint3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leela James Comment

I have just noticed that you commented on the discussion section of the Leela James page where you called her "great". Please refrain from expressing your personal opinions about individuals in the future, since this is an encyclopedia and not an opinions column.--Koolahawk (talk) 02:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]