User talk:Dani zee

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dani zee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Eric Mass or a Sock or Meat Puppet of his, I feel that this block was used to keep me from helping debate the validity of the article, this move feels like the party involved in the deletion is trying to push me out of the way while the article is deleted.

Decline reason:

If you are not Ericmaas (which would make this a sockpuppet account) AND you were not personally invited here by Ericmaas for the sole purpose of working on the HExistentialism article and helping to add votes to the WP:AFD discussion of it (which is also not allowed), then how do you explain the fact that your first edits were to this brand new article? There seems compelling behavioral evidence that either you are the same person as Ericmaas or you are here solely at his behest for the purpose of commenting on the AFD discussion in question. Per this arbcom decision, both situations are treated the same and are equally blockable. I can find no other explanation for your editing history. --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 03:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Dani zee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you look at my profile you will see that I was a user since April 2007. I have been waiting for 3 Articles to appear on Wikipedia so I could make sure that they were accurate. An Article about me career as a composer for the video game industry and an article on Ayumusoft or hExistentialism. I never wrote these articles because they would be about me. Which I know we are not supposed to do. As for why I edited it so fast; I have automated searches set up to alert me about these articles, because I know the importance of Wikipedia. If you request I will refrain from editing the article on hExistentialism

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=If you look at my profile you will see that I was a user since April 2007. I have been waiting for 3 Articles to appear on Wikipedia so I could make sure that they were accurate. An Article about me career as a composer for the video game industry and an article on Ayumusoft or hExistentialism. I never wrote these articles because they would be about me. Which I know we are not supposed to do. As for why I edited it so fast; I have automated searches set up to alert me about these articles, because I know the importance of Wikipedia. If you request I will refrain from editing the article on hExistentialism |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=If you look at my profile you will see that I was a user since April 2007. I have been waiting for 3 Articles to appear on Wikipedia so I could make sure that they were accurate. An Article about me career as a composer for the video game industry and an article on Ayumusoft or hExistentialism. I never wrote these articles because they would be about me. Which I know we are not supposed to do. As for why I edited it so fast; I have automated searches set up to alert me about these articles, because I know the importance of Wikipedia. If you request I will refrain from editing the article on hExistentialism |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=If you look at my profile you will see that I was a user since April 2007. I have been waiting for 3 Articles to appear on Wikipedia so I could make sure that they were accurate. An Article about me career as a composer for the video game industry and an article on Ayumusoft or hExistentialism. I never wrote these articles because they would be about me. Which I know we are not supposed to do. As for why I edited it so fast; I have automated searches set up to alert me about these articles, because I know the importance of Wikipedia. If you request I will refrain from editing the article on hExistentialism |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}