User talk:76.66.192.64

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (76.66.192.64) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my proposed move

I just wanted to say that I spent a lot of time trying to decide whether the move/merge of air superiority and air supremacy into a single, new article would best be classified as a move or a merger. I'm sure you would agree that it shows characteristics of both. I decided to list it in the "requested moves" because I felt that it fit best there. I would appreciate it if, in the future, you would offer suggestions of what I should do differently and why, rather than simply stating a terse opposition and recommending the closure of the discussion of my suggested move.

Thank you, --Witan 21:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

As it is not a requested move, but a merge request, you cannot use WP:RM for such a request, it is an abuse of process. It's as simple as that. As for what to do with it, I made the comment that it should be listed at WP:PM when I posted a procedural close on the WP:RM page itself. 76.66.192.64 (talk) 06:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you should remember that not all editors are as experienced in all areas of Wikipedia as you. I have almost no experience with merges and moves, so saying "It's an abuse of the process. It's as simple as that" makes it seem like you're implying two things: that I'm stupid, and also that I listed it there in bad faith. All I was saying was that your comment came across as terse, and I would have appreciated an explanation as to why it's a merge and not a move. I think you'll notice from the talk pages that I haven't disputed your judgement that it's a merger. I only wanted to know why, so that I know what to do if I come across a similar situation in the future. As of yet, you have not done that. Showing this arrogant attitude is totally uncalled for and inappropriate, and I find it to be extremely offensive.--Witan 06:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, I saw your welcome message. It's from 2005. I assumed you were an experienced editor. I apologize for misinterpreting your experience level. It did not occur to me that abuse of process was a value judgment on your actions, since to me "abuse" is the misuse of a process. Misuse need not be intentional. So perhaps I should have used the word "misuse" instead of "abuse". See dictionary.com where "abuse" defintion (1) is what I was using (To use wrongly or improperly; misuse: abuse alcohol;). I was not implying that you were intentionally using bad faith. 76.66.192.64 (talk) 07:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.