Jump to content

User talk:217.12.49.88

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 217.12.49.88 (talk) at 06:11, 27 July 2009 (→‎L2). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

L2

You'll need a reliable source for something like that. DP76764 (Talk) 06:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I checked it myself , you can check it too by connecting to that server and test whatever feature you want. It was verified by other people too on postpacific.com forum.

Please read the policy on reliable sources. Testing things for yourself does NOT constitute adequate evidence. You will need a 3rd party publisher (like a game review magazine or the like) discussing this. DP76764 (Talk) 23:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What about a forum thread where many people tested the server? [1] If you can't test the server yourself then the only thing left is to believe the others who tested it including me. I left a link to that private server in my edit because that is the only 100% trustfull source where everyone could verify it. I am not asking you to trust me, just asking to let someone who you trust to verify the server. 217.12.49.88 (talk) 02:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dp76764's answer also applies to the questions you posed on my talk page regarding this matter. Please familiarize yourself with reliable sources before adding information to Wikipedia. As per Wikipedia:No original research, "Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions, experiences, arguments, or conclusions." Articles should contain verifiable information which are backed by reliable sources. As already mentioned above, you should provide sources from a 3rd party publisher; that forum provides opinions and not actual verifiable facts, and is not considered a reliable source. --SilentAria talk 03:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The facts can be verified. The link to the forum thread again: http://postpacific.com/showthread.php?t=6 217.12.49.88 (talk) 03:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again, that discussion forum is not a reliable source. It contains speculations and opinions, and should not be used to verify facts. Please review WP:RS. --SilentAria talk 04:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The facts there can be verified, because the server is openned and running. http://postpacific.com/showthread.php?t=6&page=18 217.12.49.88 (talk) 04:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Irrelevant. Forum postings and direct experience do NOT constitute a reliable source. That's not how Wikipedia works. Please read the policies that have been (repeatedly) suggested to you. DP76764 (Talk) 04:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever wondered if your mom kissed you goodnight after giving your dad a blow job? 217.12.49.88 (talk) 04:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why are you not accepting forum posts, you won't find more reliable source than informations from people. If you have a more reliable source please write it. Another forum thread: http://forums.azuregaming.net/showthread.php?t=46108 217.12.49.88 (talk) 04:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the policy on what defines a reliable source. Particularly this:
Are web forums and blog talkbacks reliable sources?
Web forums and the talkback section of weblogs are rarely regarded as reliable. While they are often controlled by a single party (as opposed to the distributed nature of Usenet), many still permit anonymous commentary and we have no way of verifying the identity of a poster.
From WP:RS "Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand." Forum postings by anonymous and unverifiable persons do not meet this level of quality. DP76764 (Talk) 05:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
rarely doesn't mean never. This informations was confirmed by various forums not only by one. And this informations can be verified online by any expert(even low level) of lineage 2 servers. 217.12.49.88 (talk) 06:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Note

Also, please be aware that by continually reverting edits within a 24 hour time period, you may violate the 3 revert rule and be blocked from editing. DP76764 (Talk) 04:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning. Continuing to edit war and re-add this material will lead to being banned. DP76764 (Talk) 05:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:217.12.49.88&oldid=304425887"