User talk:Witchy2006

YOU

are

the

best

person

in

Wikipedia

ever!

-- Wizardy2006 21:18, August 13 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interests

At first you told us that ratings are unnecessary then, ratings should only be a week ratings stated by you, witchy2006. IN THIS SECTION IT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT THERE IS A LARGE TIME GAP BETWEEN THE TWO and not merely a week of ratings basis.

You accused me on my own page that I am a liar, that MBP won the rating race and not Darna, then i reedited my post to Maricel Soriano and other big stars on subsequent episodes, you are just making a story. I know that you love editing may bukas pa, but i smell conflict of interest bacause you keep on vandalizing the Darna 2009 article which in turn the rival show of this show through deleteing the critical response, trivia section and such while other articles here have them, was there a guideline for not having them? i believe i saw a critical reception in other movie articles here but you have also deleted that section.

J0-r3L (talk -- 14:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to Wikipedia, there is no rivalry going on, unless you wanted to. This will be long so I will have to make it into a list:

1) Ratings - The ratings section is needed to imply for the other Reception part sof the section such as the extension of the show for 14 weeks and the January 2010 extension. The extensions can never be explained without the rating information. Plus, the section shows both the ratings of TNS and AGB to avoid conflict, unlike you edits in Darna (2009 TV series) which only looks in system in AGB. Moreover, the ratings of the Darna page, doesn't even seem to connect in any part of the page unlike the May Bukas Pa rating section, which again I have to say, completes the summary of the Reception section.

2) Wrong informations being inserted - You insert a lot of wrong information in the page, especially in the Rival Show section. As I have already explained in your page.

Maricel Soriano never made an appearance on the show yet.
The episode with Dolphy did deliver "good ratings" as this link from PEP delivered by TNS, shows that Darna is only at 3rd place, May Bukas Pa at 2nd and TV Patrol World at the top. Where exactly did darna overpassed May Bukas Pa?
You've stated "and other stars" - ONLY DOLPHY was the new special guest in the show from when Darna debuted.

3) Liar? - I never once called you a liar. I checked all of my edits and not even once I have told you that. And where exactly did I make a story? All that I have mentioned is a fact. Only a person who is guilty, would remove a cooperation message in his page. Clearly, you don't want to cooperate. And I never vandalized Darna (2009 TV series), other users have agreed with me that rating section that doesn't even have any connection from anything in the page is very unnecessary. It's a good faith edit whether you like it or not. PS again, Please stop calling edits that you don't like a "vandalism".

Talkback

Hello, Witchy2006. You have new messages at GSK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GameShowKid – talk – evidence 04:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

79.72.144.110

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:79.72.144.110. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 00:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops sorry, I thought that was my talkpage, I have left an apology message to the user. Question, What are your s about the J0-r3L edit war? I have also messaged it to the board, and other users believe that he's User:GMA Fan, is it possible? --Witchy2006 (talk) 00:54, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]