Jump to content

Talk:Gynaecology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 72.91.245.68 (talk) at 03:41, 18 August 2009 (Inappropriate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMedicine Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge OB and gyn?

Should obstetrics and gynaecology be merged into a single "obstetrics and gynaecology" article? Or should obstetrics be viewed as a subset of gynaecology? -- Karada 11:09, 24 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Yes and no. The specialisms are generally practiced in tandem, but apart from their pertinence to women, they have surprisingly little in common. Keep the status quo. JFW | T@lk 14:36, 19 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a vote running at Talk:Obstetrics and gynecology on whether to rename the article in accordance with the British spelling, as this individial article is. Feel free to add your vote. (Update this talk page if this information is out of date.) haz (user talk) 19:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yess!

I think the above would be great! I hate to click out of a page!

No, and the Above comment is invalid

Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia, not a Flip-Through book. Clicking isn't a chore and 1 click more to see a subset wouldn't kill you. Gynecology should remain as is... You don't see Science or Astronomy in the same page...

augrunt 06:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


this page wes made by: Jonea Rosetti- Busa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.234.202.252 (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gynaikeia...might as well use the Greek name

According to the Suda, the ancient Greek physician Soranus practiced in Alexandria and subsequently Rome. He was the chief representative of the school of physicians known as "Methodists." His treatise Gynaecology is extant (first published in 1838, later by V. Rose, in 1882, with a 6th-century Latin translation by Moschio, a physician of the same school).


"Although it claims to be a simplified, catechistic version of Soranus' Gynaikeia produced for midwives who cannot read Greek, Muschio's text is more of a version than a translation, giving only a flavour of the original. Muscio rarely mentions Soranus by namel in some manuscripts, there is no mention of him at all."


>> JSTOR: http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0009-840X%281995%292%3A45%3A2%3C453%3AGMC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U 134.121.247.116 (talk) 06:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

male version?

could some1 tell me what a doctor who works on male nethers is called? ive looked every were and i cant find it is it just a normal doctor?Lotharsrevenge (talk) 05:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a urologist. Kafziel Complaint Department 08:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]