User talk:Carolmooredc
| Thanks for visiting my Talk page. Please Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page and
comments about the content of a specific article on the Talk page of that article. Thanks! |
/My Sandbox 1 - /My Sandbox 2 - /My Sandbox 3 - /My Sandbox 4
Images
Nice job uploading all of the images. I already deleted the original one that was here for you. Thanks again for helping me out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
RSN discussion
Carol, your comments have been the source of some discussion at Talk:Tom_G._Palmer#.22Criticism.22, and now at WP:RSN#LewRockwell.com. Cheers, DickClarkMises (talk) 23:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- That might have been too structured a proposal for people to deal with. In fact I had an idea for a whole chart. But never got together. So many wikipedia issues and articles, so little time... Commented on WP:RSN CarolMooreDC (talk) 23:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
panarchists blog
CarolMooreDC,
First, I want to thank you sincerely for the yeomans work you have done on the panarchy article. It is magnificent.
Clearly you are a person of many interests. Still, if you strongly believe in panarchy, I would like to invite you to be an author on our newly developed blog, currently using the address panarchists.wordpress.com. There is not much there yet, since I only started it up on Friday, but it has a lot of promise. I was part of a closed blog called Little Panarchy on Yahoo groups, started by a panarchist in Germany. He enrolled a number of the major players as contributors there: John Zube (Australia), Richard CB Johnsson (a Swede living in Beijing and LRC contributor), Michael Rozeff (LRC contributor), Gian Piero de Bellis (Switzerland), Adam Knott (Seattle area), and some others. That blog has since been shutdown since it became too much to manage for him. I've stepped in to keep the conversation going and hopefully enhance it.
Anyway, I wanted to thank you for what you have done for panarchy, and hope you will consider joining this blog sometime in the near future.
Dwight Johnson administrator for panarchists.wordpress.com --98.110.81.146 (talk) 16:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Responding there. CarolMooreDC (talk) 17:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
More gld info.
The South African Mint Company (Pty) Ltd is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the South African Reserve Bank (SARB). It was established on 1 September 1988 and in October 1990 moved from Pretoria to its current location at Gateway in Centurion. Its main function is to mint coinage under the Reserve Bank Act of 1989. The South African Mint can produce both legal tender and commemorative gold coins, although currently all the gold coins issued are legal tender. Decisions with respect to current and future coin programmes are taken by the Government at Cabinet level. The SARB requires Cabinet approval for planned coin issues, details of which are published annually in the Government Gazette. The coins are then struck by the SA Mint and made available for purchase by the public. The SA Mint currently Source [1] Another basic thing [2] .. I think it is pretty well known information. Regards, skip sievert (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Ms Carol
I would like (with much appreciation ) for an objective eye, opinion and all that on the Arab Professor Nassim Taleb's talkpage pretty pls.LoveMonkey (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- I took a peak. He looks very interesting. Article has lots of good sources, a few questionable, but read neither text nor sources carefully. But don't have time to figure out what is going on. Anti-Arab or anti-Libertarian/Austrian or anti-chaos bias - or all three?? Motivate me more. Too many articles, too little time. CarolMooreDC (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Still the same Ms Carol. Well..The article has a tenacious editor. Taleb as a epistemeological libertarian (aka means he's for Wikipedia) and a Metaphysical libertarian, gets all kinds of very unhappy with him, economists (that he calls conmen) with an axe to grind..Oh all three. Freedom is irrational, but so what. Reason never proves anything but self delusion, life itself is irrational. God is the generator of order and sumbebekos because God is freedom, and freedom is love. And you Ms Carol are one of the Good guys. Your time is always appreciated. LoveMonkey (talk) 17:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
People have free will, as that they can make random decisions. Decisions that are not the by products of external stimuli but are decisions of human agency. If one flips a coin one still has to accept or not accept the coins outcome. By what internal standard does one overcome random choice? Since according to determinism there is no such thing as a random choice. According to determinism no one ever gets into the situation of Buridan's ass. Since that outcome is only one possible outcome no matter what we as individuals do. LoveMonkey (talk) 19:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- I wish I had time to study the issues of that article since I do say that CONSCIOUSNESS IS THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF REALITY and that memory, imagination and free will are its essence, creating the subatomic level on up. Meditate on it!! :-) CarolMooreDC (talk) 22:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Panpsychism. Love it!LoveMonkey (talk) 03:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- I nominated the libertarian metphysics article for deletion.LoveMonkey (talk) 03:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- I really didn't pay attention to what happened with Lassky entry but it did look overly long. I do think you need a source saying directly that his brand is called libertarian. Don't know if you had one. Voted keep. CarolMooreDC (talk) 13:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- @#$% Now the exact opposite is happening on the antitheism article where an administrator denies that antitheism as a concept could be behind theist persecution. Please help? Take a looky see on its talkpage.LoveMonkey (talk) 13:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- It looks like they are removing stuff where no WP:RS uses word "antitheism." Something often down per WP:RS and WP:OR. Just have to hustle up good sources. CarolMooreDC (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
just fyi...
DC 8 (talk) (not certain if you've already received this notice)
--NBahn (talk) 11:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
user:Slrubenstein is wondering whether this should go to AfD. I'm a bit dubious about the success of an AfD, perhaps we should just redirect to Christian Zionism or gut it to a stub and start all over, what do you think? Dougweller (talk) 18:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- From researching from the UK article it does turn out that that's where Xian zionism started. And there obviously are some groups. So there is enough for a stub or even a longer article. So the question is would there be more/different info than would be in the Christian Zionism article. I haven't quite gotten around to integrating that mess, but I enjoy doing that sort of thing, so maybe I'll take a look right now. So why not give it a few days and see what the Christian Zionism history section looks like when I'm done. CarolMooreDC (talk)
Should this article be deleted? Let us know on the article talk page. Thanks! --Anthon.Eff (talk) 01:42, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
From the CSD talk page
Duplicated here:
Oh, I'm sorry. I should have pointed you to the right place rather than just telling you "not here"—how rude of me, and I apologise profusely.
The right place is Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion. Sorry again—S Marshall Talk/Cont 23:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. After dealing with this for couple days did know what FFD was. But always good to make it a WP: link just in case. :-) CarolMooreDC (talk) 23:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Project together on Anti Zionism and True Torah Jews
Wow, I can't believe I found you. Sorry I made my overture on the discussion page and not here where it belongs. This is my second only attempt to edit Wiki, my first was to have the Hippocrates Oath placed in its simplicity in the Abortion section and perhaps show how it was watered down. Of course it got no place.
I forgot my password so here is my second attempt. I see in your description that you were shocked to find subjects coming up so high in search engine and the articles in Wiki were terrible. Well here there is no article at all. I believe that you will find the question and answer section amazing, I am truly impressed by these people and the torah is a whole new world for me.
If you would like to friend me on FB, Chris Connolly - dallas
I really do not understand why everyone is anonymous about their identity on FB and Wiki. I like the Amazon approach, put in a credit card, then with a real name you can make a review.
We share a lot and there is a lot I believe that we can learn together with this project.65.248.129.126 (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)