Jump to content

Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AndrásG (talk | contribs) at 11:12, 28 October 2009 (→‎Contextual therapy: expand). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ivan Böszörményi-Nagy (May 19, 1920, Budapest, HungaryJanuary 28, 2007, Glenside, Pennsylvania) was a Hungarian-American psychiatrist and one of the founders of the field of family therapy. He emigrated from Hungary to the United States in 1950.

Contextual therapy

Böszörményi-Nagy developed the Contextual approach to family therapy and individual psychotherapy. It is a comprehensive model which integrates individual psychological, interpersonal, existential, systemic, and intergenerational dimensions of individual and family life and development.

The Contextual model emphasizes the ethical or "justice" dimension - the relational ethics - of close relationships: in particular, the roles of caring, connectedness, loyalty, legacy, guilt, fairness, accountability, and trustworthiness - within and between generations. It sees relational ethics as not just a set of prescriptive norms, nor simply as psychological phenomena, perspectives, or constructions. Rather it sees relational ethics as (i) having some objective ontological and experiential basis by virtue of being derived from basic needs and from real relationships with concrete consequences (ie, as distinct from abstract or "value" ethics); and (ii) as being significant explanatory and motivational dynamics operating - in both beneficial and destructive ways - in individuals, families, social groups, and broader society.

Multidirected partiality is the main methodological concept of contextual therapy. Its aim is to evoke a dialogue of mutual position-taking among family members. It consists of a sequential, empathic turning towards member after member (even absent members), in which both acknowledgement and expectation are directed at them. It is an alternative to the more common 'neutrality' or unilateral partiality of other approaches. It requires an appreciation of the 'ledger' from each person's point of view, even that of the current victimiser.[1][2]. For example, a family comes into therapy desiring to fix their son's outbursts and oppositional defiant behavior. The therapist would firstly have each family member explain their side of the story, in order to understand the problem in terms of background facts, the relational context, and deeper motivational processes (e.g., psychological processes, hidden loyalties and legacies, ledger imbalances, destructive entitlement resulting from real or perceived injustices, parentification of the child, etc), and not simply (as is commonly done in some other approaches) in terms of the 'behaviour' and 'interactions' of the family and the son. The therapist would then go further, sequentially 'taking sides' with each member, the aim being to find resources for rebuilding relationships through mutual acknowledgement of both dues and obligations, shifts in attitude, and redemptive or rejunctive (i.e., 'trust-building') actions, which will in turn build trustworthiness, which contextual therapists see as the ultimate relational resource for individual and family well-being.

Bibliography

Further reading

See also

References

  1. ^ Le Goff, J.F. (2001). Boszormenyi-Nagy and Contextual Therapy: An Overview, ANZJFT, 22 (3): 147–157.
  2. ^ Wolman, B. & Stricker,G. (1983) Handbook of Family and Marital Thearpy. New York: Plenum.