Jump to content

Accurate News and Information Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Steve Smith (talk | contribs) at 15:08, 12 November 2009 (copyedit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A bald, heavyset white man wearing round-rimmed glasses.
The Accurate News and Information Act was an extension of Premier William Aberhart's longtime feud with Alberta's media outlets.

The Accurate News and Information Act was a statute in Alberta, Canada. It was passed by the Legislative Assembly of Alberta in 1937 at the instigation of William Aberhart's Social Credit government. Aberhart and the Social Credit League had had a stormy relationship with the press since before the 1935 election in which they were elected to government. Virtually all of Alberta's newspapers, especially the Calgary Herald, were critical of Social Credit, as were a number of publications from elsewhere in Canada. Even the American media had greeted Aberhart's election with derision.

The Act would have required newspapers to print "clarifications" of stories that a committee of Social Credit legislators deemed inaccurate. It would also have required them to reveal their sources on demand. Though the Act won easy passage through the Social Credit-dominated legislature, Lieutenant-Governor of Alberta John C. Bowen reserved royal assent until the Supreme Court of Canada evaluated the Act's legality. In 1938's Reference re Alberta Statutes, the court found that the Act was unconstitutional, and it was therefore never signed into law.

Aberhart and the press

Before the 1935 election

William Aberhart's Social Credit League, which had never run candidates before, won a large majority in the 1935 Alberta election on the strength of promises to use a new economic theory called social credit to end depression conditions in the province. However, it did so against the almost uniform opposition of the news media. Some of the province's major newspapers were loyal to one of the more traditional parties: the Edmonton Bulletin, for example, had supported the Liberals since its inception.[1]

In early 1935, many of Aberhart's opponents, including Premier Richard Gavin Reid of the United Farmers of Alberta, were trying to force Aberhart, who had hitherto laid out his economic agenda using only vague generalities, to commit to a specific plan. The Calgary Herald took up this call, going so far as to offer him a full page to lay out his approach in detail. Aberhart refused, on the grounds that he considered the Herald's treatment of him to be unfair.[2] He frequently attacked the newspaper in speeches around the province,[3] and on April 28 suggested that his followers boycott newspapers unfriendly to him. The boycott was successful to the extent that it drove at least one newspaper out of business.[4] The Herald responded to the boycott by asking

Is everyone opposed to the political opinions and plans of Mr. Aberhart to be boycotted? He has invoked a most dangerous precedent and has given the people of this province a foretaste of the Hitlerism which will prevail if he ever secures control of the provincial administration.[4]

Shortly before the election, the Herald began to run cartoons by Stewart Cameron, a virulently anti-Aberhart cartoonist. The day before the election, it ran a Cameron cartoon featuring a car, labelled "the people", travelling along "Aberhart Highway No. 1" and approaching a railway crossing. A train, labelled "common sense", was approaching from around the bend, along tracks labelled "fundamental facts". Aberhart leans out the "S.C. Signal Tower" advising the car "All's clear. Don't stop, look or listen."[5]

Though the Herald was the newspaper most strident in its opposition to Aberhart and Social Credit, the Bulletin, the Edmonton Journal, the Medicine Hat News, the Lethbridge Herald, and many smaller papers all, in the words of Athabasca University historian Alvin Finkel, "attacked Social Credit viciously as a chimera which, if placed in power, would wreck Alberta's chances for economic recovery."[6] Of the province's major papers, only the Calgary Albertan provided even lukewarm support.[7]

So frustrated were the Social Crediters with the newspapers' hostility in the run up to the election, that in 1934 they founded their own, the Alberta Social Credit Chronicle, printed by the Albertan, to spread its side of the story.[8] The Chronicle, in addition to acting as Aberhart's mouthpiece, carried guest editorials by such figures as British fascist leader Oswald Mosley and anti-semitic priest Charles Coughlin.[9]

Post-election

Media reaction to Social Credit's crushing 1935 victory, in which it won 56 of 63 seats in the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, was almost uniformly negative. The Herald opined that "the people of Alberta have made a most unfortunate decision and may soon see the folly of it."[10] Even the Albertan expressed its wish that social credit be first tried in "Scotland, or Ethiopia or anywhere but Alberta."[11] Reaction across Canada was also negative, with the St. Catharines Standard calling the results "a nightmare that passeth all understanding" and the Montreal Star accusing Albertans of voting for "an untried man and a policy whose workings he ostentatiously refused to explain before polling day."[12] South of the American border, newspapers were less restrained: the Chicago Tribune asked "Greetings to the Canadians. Who's loony now?" and the Boston Herald's headline screamed "Alberta goes crazy".[12]

The relationship did not improve once Aberhart took office. In January 1935, H. Napier Moore wrote two articles for Maclean's casting doubt on both Aberhart's honesty and his ability to follow through on his election promises. An article in the American Collier's Weekly ran a profile that mocked Aberhart's appearance, taking note of his "vast colorless face" and his "narrow, left slanted mouth with soft, extra-heavy, bloodless lips which don't quite meet and through which he breathes wetly."[13] Though new adversaries had entered the fray, the old ones lost none of their enthusiasm. Says Finkel, finding fault with both sides of the Aberhart-press feud,

The major newspapers of the province opposed virtually everything the government did. Virtually every reform instituted was made to sound more draconian than it actually was. The conservative views of the owners and editors often interfered with the objective presentation of news reports, although perhaps not to the extent that the government claimed. In many cases, the papers simply concentrated on the very real chaos and confusion in government ranks and required few embellishments to make the government look bad.[14]

The Herald lured Stewart Cameron away from working on Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs to make him the first staff cartoonist in its history; Cameron devoted himself full-time to the ridicule of Aberhart.[15] By January 1936, the religious Aberhart was telling the listeners of his weekly radio show that he was "glad there will be no newspapers in heaven."[16]

The help combat the negative press, Aberhart resolved to acquire the Albertan, the one paper of note to show him any support. He formed a company that acquired an option to purchase, and used his radio program to promote the purchase of shares by Social Credit supporters. The other newspapers criticized him for using what was nominally a gospel program to promote stock sales.[17] The plan came to naught, as most Social Credit supporters were too poor to buy newspaper stock, and the only interested buyers were beneficiaries of government patronage, chiefly liquor interests.[18] Even so, the Albertan became the official organ of Social Credit, an editorial decision that doubled its circulation.[14]

Though John Barr, Social Credit staffer turned journalistic historian, argues that the media's unswerving hostility to Aberhart may have benefited him politically by allowing him to "depict the press as a mere tool of Eastern financial and commercial interests", Aberhart reacted bitterly. In a September 20, 1937, radio broadcast, he said of the press "these creatures with mental hydrophobia will be taken in hand and their biting and barking will cease."[19] Four days later, a special session of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta opened, with the Accurate News and Information Act figuring prominently on its order paper.[20]

The Act

The 1937 Social Credit backbenchers' revolt had forced Aberhart to abdicate a portion of his power to the newly-created Social Credit Board, which consisted of five Social Credit backbenchers charged with supervising a commission of experts. While the initial plan was to have this commission headed by C. H. Douglas, social credit's British founder, Douglas, did not like Aberhart and did not view his approach to social credit as consistent with its true form, and refused to come. Instead, he sent two of his subordinates, L. D. Byrne and G. F. Powell. These surrogate experts were charged with recommending legislation to implement social credit in Alberta. Their first round of proposals, which included measures imposing government control on banks and prohibiting any person from challenging the constitutionality of any Alberta law in court without receiving the approval of the Lieutenant-Governor in Council, was disallowed by the federal government. The second round included a drastic new tax on banks and the Accurate News and Information Act.[21]

The Act empowered the chair of the Social Credit Board to require a newspaper to reveal the names and addresses of any sources it used,[22] as well as the names and addresses of any writers, including of unsigned pieces. Non-compliance would result in fines of up to $1,000 per day, and prohibitions on the publishing of the offending newspaper, of stories by offending writers, or of information emanating from offending sources. The Act also required newspapers to print, at the instruction of the chair of the Social Credit Board, any statement "which has for its object the correction or amplification of any statement relating to any policy or activity of the Government of the Province."[22]

The Act was attacked by opposition politicians as evidence of the government's supposed fascism, and alienated even those newspapers, notably the Albertan, that had sometimes supported Aberhart.[23] The global press attention that it attracted was also cutting, with one British paper referring to Aberhart as "a little Hitler".[24] Later commenters have also treated it harshly: Finkel calls it evidence of the "increasingly authoritarian nature of the Aberhart regime",[14] and even Barr, generally sympathetic to Social Credit, calls it "a harsh blow to free speech".[24]

Lieutenant-Governor John C. Bowen, mindful of the federal government's disallowance of the Social Credit Board's earlier legislation, reserved royal assent of the Act and its companions until their legality could be tested at the Supreme Court of Canada, the first use of the power of reservation in Alberta history.[25] In the summer of 1938, Aberhart's government announced the closure of the Lieutenant-Governor's official residence in Edmonton, the cancellation of his official car, and the termination of his secretarial staff. Aberhart biographers David Elliott and Iris Miller, and Ernest Manning biographer Brian Brennan, both attribute this move to revenge for Bowen's actions with respect to the Accurate News and Information Act.[26][27]

Aftermath

On March 25, 1938, a resolution of the Social Credit-dominated legislature ordered that Don Brown, a reporter for the Edmonton Journal, be jailed "during the pleasure of the assembly" for allegedly misquoting Social Credit backbencher John L. Robinson on the inclusion of chiropractors in the Workman's Compensation Act. Brown was never actually jailed; the next day, in response to negative publicity from across Canada, the legislature passed another resolution, ordering "the release of Mr. Don C. Brown from custody." In Barr's view, "the government was made to look less ominous than silly."[28]

Around the same time, the Supreme Court ruled on the Reference re Alberta Statutes. It found that the Accurate News and Information Act, along with the others submitted to it for evaluation, was ultra vires the Alberta government.[29] In the case of the Accurate News and Information Act, the court found that the Canadian constitution included an "implied bill of rights" that protected freedom of speech as being critical to a parliamentary democracy.[30]

For its leadership in the fight against the Act, the Pulitzer Prize committee awarded the Edmonton Journal with a bronze plaque, the first time it honoured a non-American newspaper.[31] 95 other newspapers, including the Calgary Albertan, Edmonton Bulletin, Calgary Herald, Lethbridge Herald, and Medicine Hat News, were presented with engraved certificates.[32]

References

  • Barr, John J. (1974). The Dynasty: The Rise and Fall of Social Credit in Alberta. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart Limited. ISBN 077101015X.
  • Brennan, Brian (2008). The Good Steward: The Ernest C. Manning Story. Calgary, Alberta: Fifth House Ltd. ISBN 978-1-897252-16-1.
  • Byrne, T. C. (1991). Alberta's Revolutionary Leaders. Calgary, Alberta: Detselig Enterprises. ISBN 1-55059-024-3.
  • Elliott, David R.; Miller, Iris (1987). Bible Bill: A Biography of William Aberhart. Edmonton: Readmore Books. ISBN 091909144X.
  • Finkel, Alvin (1989). The Social Credit Phenomenon in Alberta. Toronto. ISBN 0-8020-6731-X.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  • Morton, Frederick Lee (2002). Law, politics, and the judicial process in Canada (3 ed.). Calgary: University of Calgary Press. ISBN 1552380467.

Notes

  1. ^ Barr 33
  2. ^ Elliott 172
  3. ^ Elliott 174
  4. ^ a b Elliott 182
  5. ^ Elliott 197
  6. ^ Finkel 36
  7. ^ Byrne 101
  8. ^ Elliott 147–148
  9. ^ Brennan 23
  10. ^ Brennan 24–25
  11. ^ Elliott 203
  12. ^ a b Elliott 202
  13. ^ Elliott 230–231
  14. ^ a b c Finkel 62
  15. ^ Elliott 240
  16. ^ Elliott 230
  17. ^ Elliott 232
  18. ^ Elliott 247
  19. ^ Barr 108
  20. ^ Barr 108–109
  21. ^ Elliott 272–273
  22. ^ a b Elliott 272
  23. ^ Elliott 273
  24. ^ a b Barr 109
  25. ^ Elliott 273
  26. ^ Elliott 278
  27. ^ Brennan 54
  28. ^ Barr 112–113
  29. ^ Barr 112
  30. ^ Morton 481–482
  31. ^ Byrne 125
  32. ^ "The Premier vs. the Constitution—Significance". Alberta Online Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2009-10-14.