User talk:LFiveZeroFive
Patronization
Please stop polluting my user talk page with annoying blabbering. I know what wikipedia is. You have no respect for an open source author. Please go and delete the PHP page, as it is a non notable web framework too. I've deleted all blabbering in here about reasons to delete the Powtils page, except for BJBot which I find hilarious. It must stand for a "blow job bot" of some sort. Blowing my user talk page up is a job it does quite well. LFiveZeroFive (talk) 07:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Lars Allen Olson
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lars Allen Olson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Lars Allen Olson. Gwernol 00:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Powtils
A tag has been placed on Powtils, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Powtils is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Powtils saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. J.delanoygabsadds 02:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Powtils
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Powtils, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Powtils. . —David Eppstein (talk) 05:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Powtils, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 11:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry me too. You edit use IP address. So, I'm just assume it vandals. Thanks for make it clear. :) --Aleenf1 16:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)