Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PoliticianTexas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZekeW (talk | contribs) at 19:25, 10 December 2009 (→‎Comments by accused parties). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

PoliticianTexas

PoliticianTexas (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


Report date December 10 2009, 08:17 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Synchronism

Obvious sock of PolTx:

  • Attempted to non-admin close after having voted on an AFD brought forth on the basis of the article being the creation of PolTx, [1][2] praised the article graciously.[3]
  • Makes similar edits to those of PolTx and his socks, specifically: repeatedly inserting a new picture for the infobox at Albuquerque, New Mexico[4][5][6], these photos are generally not PolTx's original work though he often claims otherwise, they are often copyright violations (see User talk:DoriSmith/PolTXimgs; repeatedly marking municipal officeholder's political affiliations without clear explanation of the connection (New Mexican municipalities are non-partisan) linked to a RS[7][8]; removing maintenance tags without addressing the problems given.[9][10]
  • Shows similar editing interests to PolTx and his socks (see User talk:DoriSmith/PoliticianTexas#Commonly edited pages), especially high school athletics.[11]. Wiki Stalk Results for mostly recent socks:[12].

.

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Seriously do all the "investigating" you want. But I know I'm not one. I love working on wikipedia, but I have never had a previous account. Hope to work with you all in the future. ZekeW (talk) 19:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Considering the very short time since I filed the last PolTX SPI case (on 1 Dec.), I think a checkuser would be useful to see if there are other moles waiting in line for whacking. LadyofShalott 08:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions