User talk:Wjejskenewr

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Wjejskenewr}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Hello! On Wikipedia, I spend most of my time patrolling recent changes. If, while doing so, you believe I have made a mistake, please note:

I am only human, I sometimes make mistakes. Edits I revert, I generally revert as they appear to be vandalism of some sort. If you believe I have made a mistake, just undo my edit, and leave me a message pointing it out to me here. Please don't leave me a template message, if I've made a bad edit, chances are it was a mistake. And, if I have reverted your edit, whether vandalism or a mistake, please don't abuse me with vandalism here. It will be quickly reverted.
I am not here everyday. If you leave me a message and I don't respond immediately, don't panic! I will get back to you the next time I am online and see your message.

This is Wjejskenewr's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 30 days

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Welcome!

Hello, I am P Carn (formerly known as Mr. Moose). I enjoy Wikipedia.

RFA - recommend withdrawing

I recommend withdrawing your RFA after 24 hours or after the comments become repetitive. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope by this time next year you'll sail through. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Farmville

scuse you but I dont think i vandalized on farmvile page, i was right. how dare you call me wrong! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.212.25 (talk) 21:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was on the page for Farmville, North Carolina. Your edit talking about the game FarmVille did not belong there, as there is already a wikipedia page for the game. Please let me know if you have any more questions. P Carn (talk) 22:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

can you send meh the link to theh game page PUHLEAS? 69.118.212.25 (talk) 22:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page for the game is FarmVille. P Carn (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Suisham

Precisely my point. Three was bias in the Suisham article. He did not have "poor performances" two weeks in a row. He missed three field goals in three games ... not back to back games ... and those were his only misses of the season. The current claim of "poor performances" is an editorial opinion. It's also factually inaccurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.182.185.252 (talk) 02:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken your comments into consideration, and changed the original edit so that it is not biased. The problem with your edit is that it was also biased. I believe that the article is now fine how it is. P Carn (talk) 02:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

??

why was my last edit considered vandalism? you never gave a reason —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.161.46.44 (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was not deemed meaningful enough to stay in the article. If you disagree, please post a comment on the talk page for the article to discuss it with others. --P Carn (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gillette, Wyoming

Thanks for helping here; the person or people behind these IPs doesn't/don't understand that the customary practice is to include only people with articles in notable people sections, and that the few exceptions to this rule don't include beauty queens. Nyttend (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chevrolet 300C STR8 tests

P Carn,

Ill have you know that i had the opportunity to test one of the str4 dodge neon and a Chrysler 300C str8 on a track test day. Would you like me to send the results of this test? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.7.254.137 (talk) 14:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, Wikipedia does not allow original research in the articles. The article will use published results by a verified, reliable resource. Please see here for more information on the policy. P Carn (talk) 16:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I may add a little more to this discussion, I have had extensive experience drag racing the SRT-4, as I actually own one, and the numbers that are referenced in the SRT-4 article are, if anything, conservative. I was able to get a 13.9 out of mine, with practice. Therefore it should come as no surprise that an experienced reviewer who writes for a car magazine would be able to drive even faster, as the 13.8 would indicate. The fastest stock SRT-4 ran in the 13.6 range, I've seen the video. However, just as P Carn stated above, this cannot be used as this is original research. If you (being user IP number 74.7.254.137) actually did drive the SRT-4 Neon at an SRT Track Day, that means it has been at least 3 years since you did so, and also you would have been driving a car that is driven very hard for every mile of its existence. I know, I also drove at this event at Joliet, Illinois, as an owner myself. Each car may drive a little differently, but generally the newer they are the more likely they are to perform close to manufacturer's specifications, which is why it is important to use only verifiable magazine reviews to provide evidence for numbers that are listed here at Wikipedia. Trust me, if we allowed original research here, the SRT-4 page would explode into a massive argument, and I'm sure every Honda page would be exactly the same, pretty much any sporty car. I hope this explains a little better why "personal experience" is not allowed as it is next to impossible to verify. RTShadow (talk) 03:51, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

RE: This revert -- he was smart enough to delete his own contribution. It's a copyvio :) Cheers! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 06:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. That's why it is helpful to provide edit summaries so the editors know what is happening. P Carn (talk) 06:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YOU CHANGED YOUR NAME?

Hello, I was wondering why you changed your name, in my perspective, Mr. Moose is way cooler than P Carn. Leave me a reply at this talk page:Micro 101 (talk) 19:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Micro 101[reply]

What do you mean bias

I am contradicting the BIAS views that are being represented in Henry Morris's view. They should contain Henry's view not other people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc1st (talk • contribs) 22:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The structure of your edit was biased in itself. If you believe that the article was not correct, please post on the article's talk page to discuss it with other editors, and come to a consensus. P Carn (talk) 22:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cupeyville School

Umm, all the information displayed in Cupeyville School should be removed then because everything is taken from the official site. Guliple07676767 (talk) 22:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem taking information from the original site, as long as you properly cite it. The reason your edits were reverted is because you were removing content, and adding your signature to the bottom of the article page.

Why is expressing Henry Morris's views Biased?

You should look at the content already on there that DO NOT express his view first.