Template talk:Dollhouse

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television Template‑class

	Television portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Structure

anyone got experience with structuring such a thing? Wiesengrund (talk) 03:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance

Is it necessary to have a structure up for this yet? The show hasn't even started, and there's no guarantee that the show will even be picked up. Just because something is created by Joss Wheadon doesn't make it instantly important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.47.187.170 (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the show was picked up for 7 episodes at first, which became a full 13 episodes order afterwards. so basically the "worst case" we have here is something like Firefly. --Wiesengrund (talk) 08:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, Firefly's really only important because of its strong fan following, there's no guarantee that Dollhouse will have anywhere near such a devoted following. Plus nearly every linked article in the structure hasn't even been written. In addition, the being picked up for 13 episodes thing is kind a weak argument: Fringe was picked up for an entire season and it doesn't have a structure. Just because Joss Wheadon wrote it doesn't mean its automatically gold (not yet anyway).